Guidelines for reporting research using systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe)

Abstract Systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe) is used across disciplines and topics but methodological reporting is often incomplete. We developed internationally generated, interdisciplinary guidelines for methodological reporting of such research. Using Delphi methodology, a working group of 22 experts sought group consensus in three rounds. Participants first assessed an initial set of reporting criteria (round 1). Next, in interactive meetings participants revised these criteria and reached consensus on reporting content (rounds 2 & 3). We present 20 criteria constituting the first comprehensive reporting guidelines for SCOBe research using existing, newly developed, or modified coding systems. The criteria encompass three procedural domains: 1. Research context; 2. Properties of the coding scheme; and 3. Application of the coding scheme. The presented guidelines will assist in substantiating and assessing the quality of SCOBe research. We encourage researchers to adopt these guidelines, to enhance quality of mono- and interdisciplinary research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01969-9
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for reporting research using systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe)

Peter Ejbye‐Ernst, Siyang Yuan, Gerry Humphris, Jill Mac Laren Chorney et al.
11 citations
Quality & Quantity
Delphi Technique in Research
12.45
article

Guidelines for reporting research using systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe)

Peter Ejbye‐Ernst, Siyang Yuan, Gerry Humphris, Jill Mac Laren Chorney, Mariona Portell, Richard Philpot, Sanne B. Geeraerts, Calum McHale, Richard Brown, Rianne Kok, Daphne van de Bongardt, Daniëlle Van der Giessen, Susan Branje, Marij A. Hillen, Brett Bowman, Monika H. Donker, Janneke Noordman, Chiel van der Veen, M. Sexton, Helle Daugaard Larsen, Evelien M. Hoeben, Sabine van der Asdonk
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract Systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe) is used across disciplines and topics but methodological reporting is often incomplete. We developed internationally generated, interdisciplinary guidelines for methodological reporting of such research. Using Delphi methodology, a working group of 22 experts sought group consensus in three rounds. Participants first assessed an initial set of reporting criteria (round 1). Next, in interactive meetings participants revised these criteria and reached consensus on reporting content (rounds 2 & 3). We present 20 criteria constituting the first comprehensive reporting guidelines for SCOBe research using existing, newly developed, or modified coding systems. The criteria encompass three procedural domains: 1. Research context; 2. Properties of the coding scheme; and 3. Application of the coding scheme. The presented guidelines will assist in substantiating and assessing the quality of SCOBe research. We encourage researchers to adopt these guidelines, to enhance quality of mono- and interdisciplinary research.

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(S1)
Leiden University (NL), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Dalhousie University (CA), University of St Andrews (GB), University of Dundee (GB), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Utrecht University (NL), Windesheim University of Applied Sciences (NL), Netherlands Youth Institute (NL), Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Lancaster University (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Lorentz Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Delphi Technique in Research
12.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.