Permission to Muck About, Knowledge, and the Grammar of Intuition

This paper reports on the process of making Permission to Muck About, a documentary film that explores the value of Design Research. It contrasts how science, design, art, and craft make knowledge. Before long, the film confronts the question of how we know anything at all and what mechanisms drive our assessments of the quality, originality, validity, rigour, and relevance of our research. While the answers to these questions are plural and fluid, characterised by the tensions of consensus/dissensus and healthy discussion/unhealthy derision, the challenge of navigating this landscape can frustrate and suppress great research. Based on a wide range of interviews, field research, and the creative process of crafting a coherent narrative, the film explores an often-hidden grammar of intuition, it frames a deep-rooted but under-exposed reliance on tacit knowledge and practical experience, and it concludes with an assertion that our research community—and the world in general—could benefit from a minor readjustment in the overarching epistemic commitments; we need more permission to muck about.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686169.3686175
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Permission to Muck About, Knowledge, and the Grammar of Intuition

Joseph Lindley, David Philip Green
1 citations
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
0.37
article

Permission to Muck About, Knowledge, and the Grammar of Intuition

Joseph Lindley, David Philip Green
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper reports on the process of making Permission to Muck About, a documentary film that explores the value of Design Research. It contrasts how science, design, art, and craft make knowledge. Before long, the film confronts the question of how we know anything at all and what mechanisms drive our assessments of the quality, originality, validity, rigour, and relevance of our research. While the answers to these questions are plural and fluid, characterised by the tensions of consensus/dissensus and healthy discussion/unhealthy derision, the challenge of navigating this landscape can frustrate and suppress great research. Based on a wide range of interviews, field research, and the creative process of crafting a coherent narrative, the film explores an often-hidden grammar of intuition, it frames a deep-rooted but under-exposed reliance on tacit knowledge and practical experience, and it concludes with an assertion that our research community—and the world in general—could benefit from a minor readjustment in the overarching epistemic commitments; we need more permission to muck about.

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.