Toward Appropriating Tools for Queer Use

What does it mean for a tool to be queer, and why should we be concerned with queer tools? This short paper posits a manifesto toward building tools for queer use, misuse, and appropriation. Drawing from Sara Ahmed’s notions of queer use as acts of subversion [2], queer tools counter norms through their use and misuse. In response to Shaowen Bardzell’s Feminist HCI paper [3], I argue that we can strengthen qualities of participation, pluralism, and self-disclosure in tool design by intentionally allowing for their appropriation—and why, accordingly, we should be prioritizing studying and evaluating misuse as well as use. It is my hope this manifesto opens up a discussion around the seeming paradox of designing for appropriation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686169.3686186
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Appropriating Tools for Queer Use

Jingyi Li
4 citations
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.49
article

Toward Appropriating Tools for Queer Use

Jingyi Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

What does it mean for a tool to be queer, and why should we be concerned with queer tools? This short paper posits a manifesto toward building tools for queer use, misuse, and appropriation. Drawing from Sara Ahmed’s notions of queer use as acts of subversion [2], queer tools counter norms through their use and misuse. In response to Shaowen Bardzell’s Feminist HCI paper [3], I argue that we can strengthen qualities of participation, pluralism, and self-disclosure in tool design by intentionally allowing for their appropriation—and why, accordingly, we should be prioritizing studying and evaluating misuse as well as use. It is my hope this manifesto opens up a discussion around the seeming paradox of designing for appropriation.

Pomona College (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.