Crowd Controls Crowd: Quality Improvement of Polygon Integration in Paid Crowdsourcing

Abstract. In this study, we introduce a crowd-driven data enhancement strategy for the integration of polygons in paid crowdsourcing. First, we capture redundant polygons with a web-based tool using one set of crowdworkers. Then, we present the acquired polygons to other crowdworkers in a polygon editing tool, with instructions to validate and improve those acquisitions. This procedure is repeated by showing a third set of crowdworkers the already edited polygon geometries. Furthermore, a polygon integration procedure is performed for every step, i.e., the unedited polygons, those edited once and those edited twice, allowing for a comparative qualitative analysis. This analysis is conducted with a focus on both quality and cost control, aiming for small sample sizes in order to optimize costs. Additionally, we conduct further investigations to assess the effectiveness of our approach in different use cases, and explore potential adaptions for further enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-2024-83-2024
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowd Controls Crowd: Quality Improvement of Polygon Integration in Paid Crowdsourcing

Uwe Soergel, David Collmar, Volker Walter
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Crowd Controls Crowd: Quality Improvement of Polygon Integration in Paid Crowdsourcing

Uwe Soergel, David Collmar, Volker Walter
article en

Abstract

Abstract. In this study, we introduce a crowd-driven data enhancement strategy for the integration of polygons in paid crowdsourcing. First, we capture redundant polygons with a web-based tool using one set of crowdworkers. Then, we present the acquired polygons to other crowdworkers in a polygon editing tool, with instructions to validate and improve those acquisitions. This procedure is repeated by showing a third set of crowdworkers the already edited polygon geometries. Furthermore, a polygon integration procedure is performed for every step, i.e., the unedited polygons, those edited once and those edited twice, allowing for a comparative qualitative analysis. This analysis is conducted with a focus on both quality and cost control, aiming for small sample sizes in order to optimize costs. Additionally, we conduct further investigations to assess the effectiveness of our approach in different use cases, and explore potential adaptions for further enhancement.

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. X-4-2024
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crowd Controls Crowd: Quality Improvement of Polygon Integration in Paid Crowdsourcing — Uwe Soergel, David Collmar, et al. · ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS