eDNAPlus: A Unifying Modeling Framework for DNA-based Biodiversity Monitoring

DNA-based biodiversity surveys, which involve collecting physical samples from survey sites and assaying them in the laboratory to detect species via their diagnostic DNA sequences, are increasingly being adopted for biodiversity monitoring and decision-making. The most commonly employed method, metabarcoding, combines PCR with high-throughput DNA sequencing to amplify and read “DNA barcode” sequences, generating count data indicating the number of times each DNA barcode was read. However, DNA-based data are noisy and error-prone, with several sources of variation, and cannot alone estimate the species-specific amount of DNA present at a surveyed site (DNA biomass). In this article, we present a unifying modeling framework for DNA-based survey data that allows estimation of changes in DNA biomass within species, across sites and their links to environmental covariates, while for the first time simultaneously accounting for key sources of variation, error and noise in the data-generating process, and for between-species and between-sites correlation. Bayesian inference is performed using MCMC with Laplace approximations. We describe a re-parameterization scheme for crossed-effects models designed to improve mixing, and an adaptive approach for updating latent variables, which reduces computation time. Theoretical and simulation results are used to guide study design, including the level of replication at different survey stages and the use of quality control methods. Finally, we demonstrate our new framework on a dataset of Malaise-trap samples, quantifying the effects of elevation and distance-to-road on each species, and produce maps identifying areas of high biodiversity and species DNA biomass. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2024.2412362
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

eDNAPlus: A Unifying Modeling Framework for DNA-based Biodiversity Monitoring

Jim E. Griffin, Alex Diana, R. E. Griffiths, Eleni Matechou et al.
5 citations
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
2.29
article

eDNAPlus: A Unifying Modeling Framework for DNA-based Biodiversity Monitoring

Jim E. Griffin, Alex Diana, R. E. Griffiths, Eleni Matechou, Marie I. Tosa, Douglas W. Yu, Mingjie Luo, Alex Bush
article en
5 citations

Abstract

DNA-based biodiversity surveys, which involve collecting physical samples from survey sites and assaying them in the laboratory to detect species via their diagnostic DNA sequences, are increasingly being adopted for biodiversity monitoring and decision-making. The most commonly employed method, metabarcoding, combines PCR with high-throughput DNA sequencing to amplify and read “DNA barcode” sequences, generating count data indicating the number of times each DNA barcode was read. However, DNA-based data are noisy and error-prone, with several sources of variation, and cannot alone estimate the species-specific amount of DNA present at a surveyed site (DNA biomass). In this article, we present a unifying modeling framework for DNA-based survey data that allows estimation of changes in DNA biomass within species, across sites and their links to environmental covariates, while for the first time simultaneously accounting for key sources of variation, error and noise in the data-generating process, and for between-species and between-sites correlation. Bayesian inference is performed using MCMC with Laplace approximations. We describe a re-parameterization scheme for crossed-effects models designed to improve mixing, and an adaptive approach for updating latent variables, which reduces computation time. Theoretical and simulation results are used to guide study design, including the level of replication at different survey stages and the use of quality control methods. Finally, we demonstrate our new framework on a dataset of Malaise-trap samples, quantifying the effects of elevation and distance-to-road on each species, and produce maps identifying areas of high biodiversity and species DNA biomass. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

Journal of the American Statistical AssociationVol. 120(549)
University of Essex (GB), University of East Anglia (GB), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US), Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Kent (GB), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Natural Environment Research Council, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.