Are Machine Learning Classifiers Robust Enough Against Poisoned Datasets?

Machine learning (ML) classifiers are widely used in many real-world applications for classification, prediction, and regression tasks. However, data characteristics (e.g., class imbalance, feature overlap, and superfluous augmentation) and inadequate logic inside ML classifiers for catering to data-related problems often lead to undesirable outcomes. This article delves into ML failure when data are poisoned through adversarial perturbations, which can be intentional and/or malicious. Specifically, we perturb the data composition/structure and analyze the robustness of ML classifiers in dealing with them. We found that most ML classifiers cannot withstand data perturbations, and they produce benign-looking but undesirable results. We underscore the causes of such failures, their implications for the ML field, and how to prevent them. Our work contributes to making next-generation ML classifiers more robust and reliable in the upcoming artificial intelligence (AI)-driven era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE reliability magazine
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mrl.2024.3468213
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Machine Learning Classifiers Robust Enough Against Poisoned Datasets?

Abdul Majeed, Seong Oun Hwang
IEEE reliability magazine
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Are Machine Learning Classifiers Robust Enough Against Poisoned Datasets?

Abdul Majeed, Seong Oun Hwang
article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) classifiers are widely used in many real-world applications for classification, prediction, and regression tasks. However, data characteristics (e.g., class imbalance, feature overlap, and superfluous augmentation) and inadequate logic inside ML classifiers for catering to data-related problems often lead to undesirable outcomes. This article delves into ML failure when data are poisoned through adversarial perturbations, which can be intentional and/or malicious. Specifically, we perturb the data composition/structure and analyze the robustness of ML classifiers in dealing with them. We found that most ML classifiers cannot withstand data perturbations, and they produce benign-looking but undesirable results. We underscore the causes of such failures, their implications for the ML field, and how to prevent them. Our work contributes to making next-generation ML classifiers more robust and reliable in the upcoming artificial intelligence (AI)-driven era.

IEEE reliability magazine Vol. 1(4)
Gachon University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are Machine Learning Classifiers Robust Enough Against Poisoned Datasets? — Abdul Majeed, Seong Oun Hwang · IEEE reliability magazine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS