Unionization of Graduate Medical Education Trainees: Perspectives From Designated Institutional Officials
Labor unions represent an increasing number of graduate medical education (GME) trainees in the United States. Most GME and other leaders at academic medical centers lack familiarity with resident/fellow unions, including what to expect, what decisions need to be made, and the processes involved in a unionization effort. It is important for designated institutional officials (DIOs), GME program directors, teaching faculty, and other institutional leaders to understand the drivers of resident/fellow unionization, the union organizing campaign and election process, and what follows a vote to unionize, including collective bargaining. Careful consideration of the role of educational and other institutional leaders during the unionization process is important to prevent any loss of trust between residents/fellows and those they view as their advocates. In this Commentary, the authors describe these considerations from their perspective as DIOs and GME leaders.
Authors
- John Patrick T. Co (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-1875)
- Susan Guralnick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8316-1712)
- Jeffrey S. Berns (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-6753)
- Laurence Katznelson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-5714)
Institutions
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Academic Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005903
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.93