Preference-Guided Refactored Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Code Generation

Retrieval-augmented code generation utilizes Large Language Models as the generator and significantly expands their code generation capabilities by providing relevant code, documentation, and more via the retriever. The current approach suffers from two primary limitations: 1) information redundancy. The indiscriminate inclusion of redundant information can result in resource wastage and may misguide generators, affecting their effectiveness and efficiency. 2) preference gap. Due to different optimization objectives, the retriever strives to procure code with higher ground truth similarity, yet this effort does not substantially benefit the generator. The retriever and the generator may prefer different golden code, and this gap in preference results in a suboptimal design. Additionally, differences in parameterization knowledge acquired during pre-training result in varying preferences among different generators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3694987
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preference-Guided Refactored Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Code Generation

Yun Xiong, Zhenhan Guan, Haofen Wang, Deze Wang et al.
1 citations
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
0.49
article

Preference-Guided Refactored Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Code Generation

Yun Xiong, Zhenhan Guan, Haofen Wang, Deze Wang, Zejian Shi, Shanshan Li, Xinyu Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented code generation utilizes Large Language Models as the generator and significantly expands their code generation capabilities by providing relevant code, documentation, and more via the retriever. The current approach suffers from two primary limitations: 1) information redundancy. The indiscriminate inclusion of redundant information can result in resource wastage and may misguide generators, affecting their effectiveness and efficiency. 2) preference gap. Due to different optimization objectives, the retriever strives to procure code with higher ground truth similarity, yet this effort does not substantially benefit the generator. The retriever and the generator may prefer different golden code, and this gap in preference results in a suboptimal design. Additionally, differences in parameterization knowledge acquired during pre-training result in varying preferences among different generators.

Tongji University (CN), National University of Defense Technology (CN), Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.