Case Studies on the use of Microsampling for Nonclinical Studies in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and Development

The implementation of microsampling approaches for use in nonclinical discovery and development pharmaceutical studies can have a major impact on improving animal ethics through the use of fewer animals and less invasive procedures for the collection of toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic samples. In addition, the approach offers the opportunity for obtaining improved quality of data for these studies. This can include the determination of additional timepoints and endpoints, and the ability to obtain exposure data from the same animals utilized to measure other study endpoints. This manuscript presents a number of cases where a variety of microsampling approaches have been successfully implemented by a number of organizations and serves as a guide for those considering the use of microsampling approaches as part of their drug discovery and development programs, as the adoption of these approaches are not yet universal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The AAPS Journal
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00975-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Studies on the use of Microsampling for Nonclinical Studies in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and Development

Joleen T. White, Jason Barricklow, Neil Spooner, Chiara Rospo et al.
1 citations
The AAPS Journal
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.24
article

Case Studies on the use of Microsampling for Nonclinical Studies in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and Development

Joleen T. White, Jason Barricklow, Neil Spooner, Chiara Rospo, Shefali Patel, Peter Bryan, Amanda Wilson, Ming Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The implementation of microsampling approaches for use in nonclinical discovery and development pharmaceutical studies can have a major impact on improving animal ethics through the use of fewer animals and less invasive procedures for the collection of toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic samples. In addition, the approach offers the opportunity for obtaining improved quality of data for these studies. This can include the determination of additional timepoints and endpoints, and the ability to obtain exposure data from the same animals utilized to measure other study endpoints. This manuscript presents a number of cases where a variety of microsampling approaches have been successfully implemented by a number of organizations and serves as a guide for those considering the use of microsampling approaches as part of their drug discovery and development programs, as the adoption of these approaches are not yet universal.

The AAPS JournalVol. 26(6)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Gates Foundation (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Becton Dickinson (United States) (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), Springhouse (US), UCB Pharma (Belgium) (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Case Studies on the use of Microsampling for Nonclinical Studies in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery and Development — Joleen T. White, Jason Barricklow, et al. · The AAPS Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS