Revisiting the Conflict-Resolving Problem from a Semantic Perspective

Collaborative software development significantly enhances development productivity by enabling multiple contributors to work concurrently on different branches. Despite these advantages, such collaboration often increases the likelihood of causing conflicts. Resolving these conflicts brings huge challenges, primarily due to the necessity of comprehending the differences between conflicting versions. Researchers have explored various automatic conflict resolution techniques, including unstructured, structured, and learning-based approaches. However, these techniques are mostly heuristic-based or black-box in nature, which means they do not attempt to solve the root cause of the conflicts, i.e., the existence of different program behaviors exhibited by the conflicting versions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3694993
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Conflict-Resolving Problem from a Semantic Perspective

Mengchao Ma, Yedi Zhang, Jinhao Dong, Yun Lin et al.
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

Revisiting the Conflict-Resolving Problem from a Semantic Perspective

Mengchao Ma, Yedi Zhang, Jinhao Dong, Yun Lin, Jin Song Dong, Dan Hao, Jun Sun
article en

Abstract

Collaborative software development significantly enhances development productivity by enabling multiple contributors to work concurrently on different branches. Despite these advantages, such collaboration often increases the likelihood of causing conflicts. Resolving these conflicts brings huge challenges, primarily due to the necessity of comprehending the differences between conflicting versions. Researchers have explored various automatic conflict resolution techniques, including unstructured, structured, and learning-based approaches. However, these techniques are mostly heuristic-based or black-box in nature, which means they do not attempt to solve the root cause of the conflicts, i.e., the existence of different program behaviors exhibited by the conflicting versions.

National University of Singapore (SG), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Peking University (CN), Singapore Management University (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the Conflict-Resolving Problem from a Semantic Perspective — Mengchao Ma, Yedi Zhang, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS