Electrostatic potential measurement of floating conductive objects: Some theoretical considerations and experimental results

The measurement of electrostatic potentials of floating conductive objects can, in principle, be performed by well-known basic experimental setups. Commercial equipment is readily available and the physical principles underlaying the problem are well established. However, electrostatic measurements require special attention, as significant errors can arise from the influence of the measuring setup or the misinterpretation of the results. First, the specificity of the measuring equipment must be well understood such as the difference between field mills, induction probes and feedback probes (also called electrostatic probes). These instruments create specific boundary conditions around the object being measured such as the introduction of grounded planes or the cancellation of the electric field. This influence is particularly significant when measuring floating objects as, for example, belts and suspended or flying objects. Even when results are provided directly in volts, their interpretation varies greatly depending on the instrument used. In the case of the field mills measurements, a calibration must be performed to convert the measured electric field into the potential of the floating object. This calibration is often performed by applying a known potential to the floating object. However, this procedure may introduce errors in the measured values due to the presence of the high voltage cable used to charge the object. We describe some examples of numerical calculations and show some experimental measurements on a levitating object. • Electrostatic potential of a conductive floating object. • Perturbation of the electrostatic potential of a conductive floating object by the measurement instrument. • Measurement of an electrostatic potential with a field mill and calibration problem. • Potential decay of floating conductive objects. • Gaseous neutralization of electrostatic charges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electrostatics
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2024.103986
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrostatic potential measurement of floating conductive objects: Some theoretical considerations and experimental results

Vicente Fuster-Roig, Alfredo Quijano-López, P. Molinié, Pedro Llovera‐Segovia
2 citations
Journal of Electrostatics
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
0.37
article

Electrostatic potential measurement of floating conductive objects: Some theoretical considerations and experimental results

Vicente Fuster-Roig, Alfredo Quijano-López, P. Molinié, Pedro Llovera‐Segovia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The measurement of electrostatic potentials of floating conductive objects can, in principle, be performed by well-known basic experimental setups. Commercial equipment is readily available and the physical principles underlaying the problem are well established. However, electrostatic measurements require special attention, as significant errors can arise from the influence of the measuring setup or the misinterpretation of the results. First, the specificity of the measuring equipment must be well understood such as the difference between field mills, induction probes and feedback probes (also called electrostatic probes). These instruments create specific boundary conditions around the object being measured such as the introduction of grounded planes or the cancellation of the electric field. This influence is particularly significant when measuring floating objects as, for example, belts and suspended or flying objects. Even when results are provided directly in volts, their interpretation varies greatly depending on the instrument used. In the case of the field mills measurements, a calibration must be performed to convert the measured electric field into the potential of the floating object. This calibration is often performed by applying a known potential to the floating object. However, this procedure may introduce errors in the measured values due to the presence of the high voltage cable used to charge the object. We describe some examples of numerical calculations and show some experimental measurements on a levitating object. • Electrostatic potential of a conductive floating object. • Perturbation of the electrostatic potential of a conductive floating object by the measurement instrument. • Measurement of an electrostatic potential with a field mill and calibration problem. • Potential decay of floating conductive objects. • Gaseous neutralization of electrostatic charges.

Journal of ElectrostaticsVol. 132
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire de Génie Électrique et Électronique de Paris (FR), Instituto Tecnológico de la Energía (ES), Instituto de Tecnología Química (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.