Testing the relationship between preferences for infant-directed speech and vocabulary development: A multi-lab study

From early on, infants show a preference for infant-directed speech (IDS) over adult-directed speech (ADS), and exposure to IDS has been correlated with language outcome measures such as vocabulary. The present multi-laboratory study explores this issue by investigating whether there is a link between early preference for IDS and later vocabulary size. Infants' preference for IDS was tested as part of the ManyBabies 1 project, and follow-up CDI data were collected from a subsample of this dataset at 18 and 24 months. A total of 341 (18 months) and 327 (24 months) infants were tested across 21 laboratories. In neither preregistered analyses with North American and UK English, nor exploratory analyses with a larger sample did we find evidence for a relation between IDS preference and later vocabulary. We discuss implications of this finding in light of recent work suggesting that IDS preference measured in the laboratory has low test-retest reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Language
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000924000254
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the relationship between preferences for infant-directed speech and vocabulary development: A multi-lab study

Ali H. Al‐Hoorie, Alexis K. Black, Anja Gampe, Nonah M. Olesen et al.
3 citations
Journal of Child Language
Language Development and Disorders
1.58
article

Testing the relationship between preferences for infant-directed speech and vocabulary development: A multi-lab study

Ali H. Al‐Hoorie, Alexis K. Black, Anja Gampe, Nonah M. Olesen, Krista Byers‐Heinlein, Jennifer L. Rennels, Cara H. Cashon, Agata Bochyńska, Natalia Kartushina, Samantha Durrant, Angeline Tsui, Tom Fritzsche, Naomi Havron, Marina Kammermeier, Nayeli Gonzalez‐Gomez, Joscelin Rocha‐Hidalgo, Catherine Davies, Mitsuhiko Ota, Eon‐Suk Ko, Yana Ryjova, Christina Bergmann, Andrew Jessop, Christine Potter, Erin E. Hannon, Mélanie Söderström, Julien Mayor, J. Kiley Hamlin, Veronica Boyce, Casey Lew‐Williams, Alia Martin, Janet F. Werker, Karli Nave, Mohammed K. AlShakhori, Hyunji Kim, Laura Anderson, Luis E. Muñoz, Michael C. Frank, Amanda Seidl, Jessica Hay, Markus Paulus, Barbora Skarabela, Lauren C Machon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

From early on, infants show a preference for infant-directed speech (IDS) over adult-directed speech (ADS), and exposure to IDS has been correlated with language outcome measures such as vocabulary. The present multi-laboratory study explores this issue by investigating whether there is a link between early preference for IDS and later vocabulary size. Infants' preference for IDS was tested as part of the ManyBabies 1 project, and follow-up CDI data were collected from a subsample of this dataset at 18 and 24 months. A total of 341 (18 months) and 327 (24 months) infants were tested across 21 laboratories. In neither preregistered analyses with North American and UK English, nor exploratory analyses with a larger sample did we find evidence for a relation between IDS preference and later vocabulary. We discuss implications of this finding in light of recent work suggesting that IDS preference measured in the laboratory has low test-retest reliability.

Journal of Child LanguageVol. 52(5)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Leeds (GB), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Arizona (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Liverpool (GB), Chosun University (KR), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Oslo (NO), Princeton University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu (SA), University of Manchester (GB), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL), University of Louisville Hospital (US), University of Manitoba (CA), Concordia University (CA), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Haifa (IL), Stanford University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Norges Forskningsråd, National Institutes of Health, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Language Development and Disorders
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.