Charting Progress in the Science of Technical Assistance for Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions

Technical assistance (TA) has long been a strategy utilized to support implementation of a range of different evidence-based interventions within clinical, community and other service settings. Great progress has come in extending the evidence base to support TA's use across multiple contexts, the result of more extensive categorizing of implementation strategies to support systematic studies of their effectiveness in facilitating successful implementation. This commentary builds on that progress to suggest several opportunities for future investigation and collaborative activity among researchers, practitioners, policymakers and other key decision-makers in hopes of continuing to build the success highlighted in this special issue and elsewhere. Authors call for increased attention to operationalization and tailoring of TA, considering how TA services can be sustained over time and how to consider externally-provided TA versus that housed within an organization. In addition, the commentary suggests a few key areas for capacity-building that can increase the quality, reach, and impact of TA for the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241293447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting Progress in the Science of Technical Assistance for Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions

Gila I. Neta, David Chambers
1 citations
Evaluation & the Health Professions
Health Policy Implementation Science
0.85
article

Charting Progress in the Science of Technical Assistance for Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions

Gila I. Neta, David Chambers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Technical assistance (TA) has long been a strategy utilized to support implementation of a range of different evidence-based interventions within clinical, community and other service settings. Great progress has come in extending the evidence base to support TA's use across multiple contexts, the result of more extensive categorizing of implementation strategies to support systematic studies of their effectiveness in facilitating successful implementation. This commentary builds on that progress to suggest several opportunities for future investigation and collaborative activity among researchers, practitioners, policymakers and other key decision-makers in hopes of continuing to build the success highlighted in this special issue and elsewhere. Authors call for increased attention to operationalization and tailoring of TA, considering how TA services can be sustained over time and how to consider externally-provided TA versus that housed within an organization. In addition, the commentary suggests a few key areas for capacity-building that can increase the quality, reach, and impact of TA for the future.

Evaluation & the Health ProfessionsVol. 47(4)
National Institutes of Health (US), National Cancer Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Health Policy Implementation Science
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Charting Progress in the Science of Technical Assistance for Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions — Gila I. Neta, David Chambers · Evaluation & the Health Professions (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS