De-centring the interface. Towards the integrated study of interfacial relations

Digital interfaces have become the primary way people relate to technology. While tangible and graphical user interfaces have long attracted scholarly attention, a variety of different interfaces connect cityscapes, homes, and brains with the digital realm. These connections may be lifesaving for some and a vehicle for invasive surveillance for others. Interfaces are thus also sites where layered relations, both digital and analogue, become translated, contested, and maintained. Furthermore, interfaces lie at the heart of new forms of machine-to-machine interaction and coordination. Software interfaces such as Application Programming Interfaces, have come to play a pivotal role in shaping platform economies, or automating entire sectors such as stock trading. Despite their ubiquity and variety, interfaces are largely reduced to a user-facing device, for example, a screen or a keyboard. In this article, we endeavour to go beyond this narrow notion of the interface. Drawing on an emerging body of literature that takes interfaces as the starting point for studies of the digital, we lay the groundwork for the integrated study of interfaces that conceptualises them as processual, distributed, and constitutively political. From this perspective, we focus not on what interfaces are but what they do. This shift towards processes of interfacing expands the scope of interface studies beyond the user-machine relation and towards the body-machine and machine-to-machine relation. Ultimately, we contend that interface studies must account for the layering of these interfacial relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Communication & Society
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2413110
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-centring the interface. Towards the integrated study of interfacial relations

Benjamin Lipp, Athanasios Karafillidis, Paula Helm, Roser Pujadas
3 citations
Information Communication & Society
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
article

De-centring the interface. Towards the integrated study of interfacial relations

Benjamin Lipp, Athanasios Karafillidis, Paula Helm, Roser Pujadas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Digital interfaces have become the primary way people relate to technology. While tangible and graphical user interfaces have long attracted scholarly attention, a variety of different interfaces connect cityscapes, homes, and brains with the digital realm. These connections may be lifesaving for some and a vehicle for invasive surveillance for others. Interfaces are thus also sites where layered relations, both digital and analogue, become translated, contested, and maintained. Furthermore, interfaces lie at the heart of new forms of machine-to-machine interaction and coordination. Software interfaces such as Application Programming Interfaces, have come to play a pivotal role in shaping platform economies, or automating entire sectors such as stock trading. Despite their ubiquity and variety, interfaces are largely reduced to a user-facing device, for example, a screen or a keyboard. In this article, we endeavour to go beyond this narrow notion of the interface. Drawing on an emerging body of literature that takes interfaces as the starting point for studies of the digital, we lay the groundwork for the integrated study of interfaces that conceptualises them as processual, distributed, and constitutively political. From this perspective, we focus not on what interfaces are but what they do. This shift towards processes of interfacing expands the scope of interface studies beyond the user-machine relation and towards the body-machine and machine-to-machine relation. Ultimately, we contend that interface studies must account for the layering of these interfacial relations.

Information Communication & SocietyVol. 28(8)
Helmut Schmidt University (DE), University College London (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.