Data-driven machine learning approaches for precise lithofacies identification in complex geological environments

Reservoir characterization is a vital task within the oil and gas industry, with the identification of lithofacies in subsurface formations being a fundamental aspect of this process. However, lithofacies identification in complex geological environments with high dimensions, such as the Lower Indus Basin in Pakistan, poses a notable challenge, especially when dealing with limited data. To address this issue, we propose four common data-driven machine learning approaches: multi-resolution graph-based clustering (MRGC), artificial neural networks (ANN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and self-organizing map (SOM). We utilized these proposed approaches to assess their performance in scenarios with varying core sample availability, specifically evaluating their effectiveness in identifying lithofacies within the Lower Goru formation of the middle Indus Basin. The study reveals that in scenarios with a limited number of core samples, MRGC is the preferred choice, while KNN or MRGC is more suitable for larger datasets. The results demonstrate the superior performance of MRGC and KNN in lithofacies identification within the specified geological environment, with SOM following closely behind, and ANN exhibiting comparatively lower efficacy. The accurate identification of lithofacies from the selected model is complemented by the application of the truncated Gaussian simulation method for facies modeling. Comparative results confirm the excellent agreement between the model identification of lithofacies from well logs and electro-facies obtained from the truncated Gaussian simulation electro-facies volume. This study highlights the crucial role of selecting the right machine learning approach for precise lithofacies identification and modeling in complex geological environments. The comparative analysis provides practitioners in the petroleum industry with insights into the strengths and limitations of each method, enhancing existing knowledge. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of comprehensive research and method selection for advancing lithofacies identification in diverse formations or study areas, ultimately benefiting the broader field of subsurface characterization in the petroleum industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geo-spatial Information Science
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2024.2405635
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven machine learning approaches for precise lithofacies identification in complex geological environments

Hao Zhang, Huolin Ma, Peimin Zhu, Umar Ashraf et al.
15 citations
Geo-spatial Information Science
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
5.21
article

Data-driven machine learning approaches for precise lithofacies identification in complex geological environments

Hao Zhang, Huolin Ma, Peimin Zhu, Umar Ashraf, Muhammad Ali, Wakeel Hussain, Ren Jiang
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Reservoir characterization is a vital task within the oil and gas industry, with the identification of lithofacies in subsurface formations being a fundamental aspect of this process. However, lithofacies identification in complex geological environments with high dimensions, such as the Lower Indus Basin in Pakistan, poses a notable challenge, especially when dealing with limited data. To address this issue, we propose four common data-driven machine learning approaches: multi-resolution graph-based clustering (MRGC), artificial neural networks (ANN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and self-organizing map (SOM). We utilized these proposed approaches to assess their performance in scenarios with varying core sample availability, specifically evaluating their effectiveness in identifying lithofacies within the Lower Goru formation of the middle Indus Basin. The study reveals that in scenarios with a limited number of core samples, MRGC is the preferred choice, while KNN or MRGC is more suitable for larger datasets. The results demonstrate the superior performance of MRGC and KNN in lithofacies identification within the specified geological environment, with SOM following closely behind, and ANN exhibiting comparatively lower efficacy. The accurate identification of lithofacies from the selected model is complemented by the application of the truncated Gaussian simulation method for facies modeling. Comparative results confirm the excellent agreement between the model identification of lithofacies from well logs and electro-facies obtained from the truncated Gaussian simulation electro-facies volume. This study highlights the crucial role of selecting the right machine learning approach for precise lithofacies identification and modeling in complex geological environments. The comparative analysis provides practitioners in the petroleum industry with insights into the strengths and limitations of each method, enhancing existing knowledge. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of comprehensive research and method selection for advancing lithofacies identification in diverse formations or study areas, ultimately benefiting the broader field of subsurface characterization in the petroleum industry.

Geo-spatial Information ScienceVol. 28(4)
Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology (CN), Yunnan University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
5.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.