Accounting for solidarity: trust and results as a replacement of contracts in water operators’ partnerships

ABSTRACT Water operators' partnerships (WOPs) differ from other types of collaborations in that they are ‘solidarity-based’. By focusing on two partnerships between utilities from the Netherlands and Malawi, this article examines how accountability is addressed in solidarity-based WOPs. The article finds that the solidarity-based nature of these partnerships makes accountability between partners through contractual arrangements challenging. In such a setting, multiple and diverse lines of accountability exist. In particular, trust appears to complement more formal accountability mechanisms. At the same time, this trust relationship is only possible as long as the partnerships produce the desired operational results. The cases furthermore suggest that rather than think about optimal accountability mechanisms, ensuring accountability mechanisms that are sufficient and accepted by both partners is already an achievement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2024.112
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for solidarity: trust and results as a replacement of contracts in water operators’ partnerships

Mireia Tutusaus, Klaas Schwartz, Sajib Mahanta
2 citations
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.08
article

Accounting for solidarity: trust and results as a replacement of contracts in water operators’ partnerships

Mireia Tutusaus, Klaas Schwartz, Sajib Mahanta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water operators' partnerships (WOPs) differ from other types of collaborations in that they are ‘solidarity-based’. By focusing on two partnerships between utilities from the Netherlands and Malawi, this article examines how accountability is addressed in solidarity-based WOPs. The article finds that the solidarity-based nature of these partnerships makes accountability between partners through contractual arrangements challenging. In such a setting, multiple and diverse lines of accountability exist. In particular, trust appears to complement more formal accountability mechanisms. At the same time, this trust relationship is only possible as long as the partnerships produce the desired operational results. The cases furthermore suggest that rather than think about optimal accountability mechanisms, ensuring accountability mechanisms that are sufficient and accepted by both partners is already an achievement.

Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for DevelopmentVol. 14(11)
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL), Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.