Efficacy of microbiological nematicides in controlling root-knot nematodes in tomato

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are considered a limiting factor for tomato production, causing substantial economic losses. Several control measures have been used to control RKNs in infested areas, such as crop rotation or succession with non-host species, using resistant cultivars, and applying chemical and biological nematicides. Here, we examined the control effect of six microbiological products (Ag109 - Bacillus velezensis , Votivo Prime - B. firmus , Quartzo - B. subtilis and B. licheniformis , Veraneio - B. amyloliquefaciens , Nemat - Purpureocillium lilacinum , and Rizotec - Pochonia chlamydosporia ) against different species of Meloidogyne in tomatoes cultivated in a greenhouse and evaluated these products under field conditions to verify their impact on root-associated nematode populations and agronomic and physicochemical traits of fruits from grafted and non-grafted tomato plants. For the greenhouse studies, higher pathogenicity was observed for tomato with M. javanica and M. enterolobii compared to M. incognita . The microbiological nematicides were more effective in controlling M. javanica and M. enterolobii , while for M. incognita , the evaluated products were ineffective. Regarding the field studies, most of the microbiological nematicides evaluated effectively increased production per plant. However, when analyzing the Meloidogyne population in the field, applying microbiological nematicides showed no nematode control in plants without rootstock. On the other hand, in the grafted plants, the Ag109, Veraneio, Rizotec, and Nemat treatments boosted the reduction in the Meloidogyne population in the roots, with average reductions of 68.47, 57.97, 77.29, and 56.70%, respectively. These results indicate the effectiveness of integrated management of microbiological nematicides and resistant rootstock in tomato. Furthermore, combining these two control measures resulted in no change in the nutritional quality of tomato fruits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Agronomy
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1462323
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of microbiological nematicides in controlling root-knot nematodes in tomato

Andressa Cristina Zamboni Machado, Alison Fernando Nogueira, Diego Santos Fagundes, Silas Mian et al.
9 citations
Frontiers in Agronomy
Nematode management and characterization studies
5.40
article

Efficacy of microbiological nematicides in controlling root-knot nematodes in tomato

Andressa Cristina Zamboni Machado, Alison Fernando Nogueira, Diego Santos Fagundes, Silas Mian, Mirela Mosela, Renato Barros de Lima Filho, Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves, Débora Cristina Santiago, Karoline Barbosa Pontes
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are considered a limiting factor for tomato production, causing substantial economic losses. Several control measures have been used to control RKNs in infested areas, such as crop rotation or succession with non-host species, using resistant cultivars, and applying chemical and biological nematicides. Here, we examined the control effect of six microbiological products (Ag109 - Bacillus velezensis , Votivo Prime - B. firmus , Quartzo - B. subtilis and B. licheniformis , Veraneio - B. amyloliquefaciens , Nemat - Purpureocillium lilacinum , and Rizotec - Pochonia chlamydosporia ) against different species of Meloidogyne in tomatoes cultivated in a greenhouse and evaluated these products under field conditions to verify their impact on root-associated nematode populations and agronomic and physicochemical traits of fruits from grafted and non-grafted tomato plants. For the greenhouse studies, higher pathogenicity was observed for tomato with M. javanica and M. enterolobii compared to M. incognita . The microbiological nematicides were more effective in controlling M. javanica and M. enterolobii , while for M. incognita , the evaluated products were ineffective. Regarding the field studies, most of the microbiological nematicides evaluated effectively increased production per plant. However, when analyzing the Meloidogyne population in the field, applying microbiological nematicides showed no nematode control in plants without rootstock. On the other hand, in the grafted plants, the Ag109, Veraneio, Rizotec, and Nemat treatments boosted the reduction in the Meloidogyne population in the roots, with average reductions of 68.47, 57.97, 77.29, and 56.70%, respectively. These results indicate the effectiveness of integrated management of microbiological nematicides and resistant rootstock in tomato. Furthermore, combining these two control measures resulted in no change in the nutritional quality of tomato fruits.

Frontiers in AgronomyVol. 6
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nematode management and characterization studies
5.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.