Technological Distance: A New Way of Conceptualizing the “Distance” in Distance Learning

This paper presents the concept of technological distance, which describes a gap between technologies (broadly defined to include methods, tools, principles, and processes) available for a learner to learn, and those needed to complete that learning. This gap is a measure of both the participation and autonomy of learners in the process. Available technologies may include those provided by teachers and institutions as well as from many others, most notably including the learners themselves. The technologies that make up the assembly—pedagogies and regulations as much as digital devices or classrooms—are only components, however. What matters most is how learners fill the gaps between them to achieve their learning goals. These are fundamentally situated, idiosyncratic, and human. Technological distance provides new insights into other models that use spatial metaphors, such as the presences of communities of inquiry and transactional distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Conference
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2023.3.1.278
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technological Distance: A New Way of Conceptualizing the “Distance” in Distance Learning

Jon Dron
The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Conference
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Technological Distance: A New Way of Conceptualizing the “Distance” in Distance Learning

Jon Dron
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the concept of technological distance, which describes a gap between technologies (broadly defined to include methods, tools, principles, and processes) available for a learner to learn, and those needed to complete that learning. This gap is a measure of both the participation and autonomy of learners in the process. Available technologies may include those provided by teachers and institutions as well as from many others, most notably including the learners themselves. The technologies that make up the assembly—pedagogies and regulations as much as digital devices or classrooms—are only components, however. What matters most is how learners fill the gaps between them to achieve their learning goals. These are fundamentally situated, idiosyncratic, and human. Technological distance provides new insights into other models that use spatial metaphors, such as the presences of communities of inquiry and transactional distance.

The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association ConferenceVol. 3(1)
Athabasca University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Technological Distance: A New Way of Conceptualizing the “Distance” in Distance Learning — Jon Dron · The Open/Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Conference (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS