A Multi-institutional Cluster Analysis to Identify Groups of Courses with Exemplary Opportunity Gaps for Undergraduate Students in the Biological Sciences

Examining institutional data from seven cohorts of students intending to major in biology across five research-intensive institutions, this work analyzes opportunity gaps-defined as the difference between the grade received by students from the dominant and nondominant sociodemographic groups in institutions of higher education-at the course-section level across mathematics, physics, biology, and chemistry disciplines. From this analysis, we find that the majority of course sections have large opportunity gaps between female and male students, students who are Black, Latino/a/e/x, or indigenous to the United States and its territories and students who are White or Asian, first-generation and non-first-generation students, and low-income and non-low-income students. This work provides a framework to analyze equity across institutions using robust methodology, including: using multiple approaches to measure grades, quantile regression rankscores which adjust for previous academic performance, and cluster analysis. Recommendations are provided for institutions to identify faculty who have equitable course sections, automate equity analyses, and compare results to other institutions to make a change toward more equitable outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0051
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-institutional Cluster Analysis to Identify Groups of Courses with Exemplary Opportunity Gaps for Undergraduate Students in the Biological Sciences

Rebecca L. Matz, Kameryn Denaro, Hye Rin Lee, W. Carson Byrd et al.
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Higher Education Research Studies
article

A Multi-institutional Cluster Analysis to Identify Groups of Courses with Exemplary Opportunity Gaps for Undergraduate Students in the Biological Sciences

Rebecca L. Matz, Kameryn Denaro, Hye Rin Lee, W. Carson Byrd, Timothy A. McKay, Benjamin P. Koester, Brian K. Sato, Marco Molinaro, Chris Mead, Stefano Fiorini, Nita A. Tarchinski, Meryl Motika, Montserrat Valdivia Medinaceli
article en

Abstract

Examining institutional data from seven cohorts of students intending to major in biology across five research-intensive institutions, this work analyzes opportunity gaps-defined as the difference between the grade received by students from the dominant and nondominant sociodemographic groups in institutions of higher education-at the course-section level across mathematics, physics, biology, and chemistry disciplines. From this analysis, we find that the majority of course sections have large opportunity gaps between female and male students, students who are Black, Latino/a/e/x, or indigenous to the United States and its territories and students who are White or Asian, first-generation and non-first-generation students, and low-income and non-low-income students. This work provides a framework to analyze equity across institutions using robust methodology, including: using multiple approaches to measure grades, quantile regression rankscores which adjust for previous academic performance, and cluster analysis. Recommendations are provided for institutions to identify faculty who have equitable course sections, automate equity analyses, and compare results to other institutions to make a change toward more equitable outcomes.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 23(4)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of Michigan (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of Delaware (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Purdue University, University of Minnesota, Arizona State University, Michigan State University, University of Pittsburgh, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, University of California, Davis, University of California, Irvine
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.