Model Free Method of Screening Training Data for Adversarial Datapoints Through Local Lipschitz Quotient Analysis

It is often challenging to pick suitable data features for learning problems. Sometimes certain regions of the data are harder to learn because they are not well characterized by the selected data features. The challenge is amplified when resources for sensing and computation are limited and time-critical, yet reliable decisions must be made. For example, a robotic system for preventing falls of elderly people needs a real-time fall predictor, with low false positive and false negative rates, using a simple wearable sensor to activate a fall prevention mechanism. Here we present a methodology for assessing the learnability of data based on the Lipschitz quotient. We develop a procedure for determining which regions of the dataset contain adversarial data points, input data that look similar but belong to different target classes. Regardless of the learning model, it will be hard to learn such data. We then present a method for determining which additional feature(s) are most effective in improving the predictability of each of these regions. This is a model-independent data analysis that can be executed before constructing a prediction model through machine learning or other techniques. We demonstrate this method on two synthetic datasets and a dataset of human falls, which uses inertial measurement unit signals. For the fall dataset, we identified two groups of adversarial data points and improved the predictability of each group over the baseline dataset, as assessed by Lipschitz, by using 2 different sets of features. This work offers a valuable tool for assessing data learnability that can be applied to not only fall prediction problems, but also other robotics applications that learn from data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3483628
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model Free Method of Screening Training Data for Adversarial Datapoints Through Local Lipschitz Quotient Analysis

H. Harry Asada, Emily Kamienski
2 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
1.56
article

Model Free Method of Screening Training Data for Adversarial Datapoints Through Local Lipschitz Quotient Analysis

H. Harry Asada, Emily Kamienski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is often challenging to pick suitable data features for learning problems. Sometimes certain regions of the data are harder to learn because they are not well characterized by the selected data features. The challenge is amplified when resources for sensing and computation are limited and time-critical, yet reliable decisions must be made. For example, a robotic system for preventing falls of elderly people needs a real-time fall predictor, with low false positive and false negative rates, using a simple wearable sensor to activate a fall prevention mechanism. Here we present a methodology for assessing the learnability of data based on the Lipschitz quotient. We develop a procedure for determining which regions of the dataset contain adversarial data points, input data that look similar but belong to different target classes. Regardless of the learning model, it will be hard to learn such data. We then present a method for determining which additional feature(s) are most effective in improving the predictability of each of these regions. This is a model-independent data analysis that can be executed before constructing a prediction model through machine learning or other techniques. We demonstrate this method on two synthetic datasets and a dataset of human falls, which uses inertial measurement unit signals. For the fall dataset, we identified two groups of adversarial data points and improved the predictability of each group over the baseline dataset, as assessed by Lipschitz, by using 2 different sets of features. This work offers a valuable tool for assessing data learnability that can be applied to not only fall prediction problems, but also other robotics applications that learn from data.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 9(12)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Model Free Method of Screening Training Data for Adversarial Datapoints Through Local Lipschitz Quotient Analysis — H. Harry Asada, Emily Kamienski · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS