Societal and Structural Risks of Biometric ID: Towards People’s Right to Privacy

This article examines the societal and structural risks linked to digital ID programmes in Africa and the adequacy of regulatory and legislative responses that are in progress in this area. It unpacks the disjointedness between the societal and structural nature of the risks and the individualistic orientation of the right to privacy and data protection often presented as a response to such risks. To address these incongruities, the article argues for people’s right to privacy as a complementary layer of protection to mitigate the societal and structural risks associated with digital ID programmes. The account of people’s privacy proposed in this article draws on the people-centric African perspective on human rights as reflected in the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (the Banjul Charter), African philosophy that is rooted in communality, scholarships in the area of group privacy, people-centric due diligence assessment, and the AU Data Policy Framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technology and Society
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218241281941
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Societal and Structural Risks of Biometric ID: Towards People’s Right to Privacy

Kebene Wodajo
Science Technology and Society
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Societal and Structural Risks of Biometric ID: Towards People’s Right to Privacy

Kebene Wodajo
article en

Abstract

This article examines the societal and structural risks linked to digital ID programmes in Africa and the adequacy of regulatory and legislative responses that are in progress in this area. It unpacks the disjointedness between the societal and structural nature of the risks and the individualistic orientation of the right to privacy and data protection often presented as a response to such risks. To address these incongruities, the article argues for people’s right to privacy as a complementary layer of protection to mitigate the societal and structural risks associated with digital ID programmes. The account of people’s privacy proposed in this article draws on the people-centric African perspective on human rights as reflected in the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (the Banjul Charter), African philosophy that is rooted in communality, scholarships in the area of group privacy, people-centric due diligence assessment, and the AU Data Policy Framework.

Science Technology and SocietyVol. 29(4)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.