Modelling the spatial variability and uncertainty for under-vaccination and zero-dose children in fragile settings

Universal access to childhood vaccination is important to child health and sustainable development. Here we identify, at a fine spatial scale, under-immunized children and zero-dose children. Using Chad, as an example, the most recent nationally representative household survey that included recommended vaccine antigens was assembled. Age-disaggregated population (12-23 months) and vaccination coverage were modelled at a fine spatial resolution scale (1km × 1 km) using a Bayesian geostatistical framework adjusting for a set of parsimonious covariates. There was a variation at fine spatial scale in the population 12-23 months a national mean of 18.6% (CrI 15.8%-22.6%) with the highest proportion in the South-East district of Laremanaye 20.0% (14.8-25.0). Modelled coverage at birth was 49.0% (31.2%-75.3%) for BCG, 44.8% (27.1-74.3) for DTP1, 24.7% (12.5-46.3) for DTP3 and 47.0% (30.6-71.0) for measles (MCV1). Combining coverage estimates with the modelled population at a fine spatial scale yielded 312,723 (Lower estimate 156055-409266) zero-dose children based on DTP1. Improving routine immunization will require investment in the health system as part of enhancing primary health care. The uncertainties in our estimates highlight areas that require further investigation and higher quality data to gain a better understanding of vaccination coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74982-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the spatial variability and uncertainty for under-vaccination and zero-dose children in fragile settings

Reggis Katsande, Johnson Muluh Ticha, Marta Gacic-Dobo, M. Carolina Danovaro‐Holliday et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
article

Modelling the spatial variability and uncertainty for under-vaccination and zero-dose children in fragile settings

Reggis Katsande, Johnson Muluh Ticha, Marta Gacic-Dobo, M. Carolina Danovaro‐Holliday, Lawrence N. Kazembe, Bénido Impouma, Akpaka Kalu, Victor A. Alegana, Charles W. Shey, Jason M. Mwenda
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Universal access to childhood vaccination is important to child health and sustainable development. Here we identify, at a fine spatial scale, under-immunized children and zero-dose children. Using Chad, as an example, the most recent nationally representative household survey that included recommended vaccine antigens was assembled. Age-disaggregated population (12-23 months) and vaccination coverage were modelled at a fine spatial resolution scale (1km × 1 km) using a Bayesian geostatistical framework adjusting for a set of parsimonious covariates. There was a variation at fine spatial scale in the population 12-23 months a national mean of 18.6% (CrI 15.8%-22.6%) with the highest proportion in the South-East district of Laremanaye 20.0% (14.8-25.0). Modelled coverage at birth was 49.0% (31.2%-75.3%) for BCG, 44.8% (27.1-74.3) for DTP1, 24.7% (12.5-46.3) for DTP3 and 47.0% (30.6-71.0) for measles (MCV1). Combining coverage estimates with the modelled population at a fine spatial scale yielded 312,723 (Lower estimate 156055-409266) zero-dose children based on DTP1. Improving routine immunization will require investment in the health system as part of enhancing primary health care. The uncertainties in our estimates highlight areas that require further investigation and higher quality data to gain a better understanding of vaccination coverage.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
World Health Organization (CH), World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (CG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.