Do the Effects Persist? An Examination of Long-Term Effects After Students Leave Turnaround Schools

Whole-school reforms have received widespread attention, but a critical limitation of the current literature is the lack of evidence around whether these extensive and costly interventions improve students’ long-term outcomes after they leave reform schools. Leveraging Tennessee’s statewide turnaround reforms, we use difference-in-differences models to estimate the effect of attending a turnaround middle school on student outcomes in high school, including test scores, attendance, chronic absenteeism, disciplinary actions, drop out, and high school graduation. We find little evidence to support improved long-run student outcomes—mostly null effects that are nearly zero in magnitude. Our results contribute to a broad call for educational researchers to examine whether school reforms meaningfully affect student outcomes beyond short-term improvements in test scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241284026
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do the Effects Persist? An Examination of Long-Term Effects After Students Leave Turnaround Schools

Ron Zimmer, Lam Pham, Sean P. Corcoran, Gary T. Henry
American Educational Research Journal
School Choice and Performance
article

Do the Effects Persist? An Examination of Long-Term Effects After Students Leave Turnaround Schools

Ron Zimmer, Lam Pham, Sean P. Corcoran, Gary T. Henry
article en

Abstract

Whole-school reforms have received widespread attention, but a critical limitation of the current literature is the lack of evidence around whether these extensive and costly interventions improve students’ long-term outcomes after they leave reform schools. Leveraging Tennessee’s statewide turnaround reforms, we use difference-in-differences models to estimate the effect of attending a turnaround middle school on student outcomes in high school, including test scores, attendance, chronic absenteeism, disciplinary actions, drop out, and high school graduation. We find little evidence to support improved long-run student outcomes—mostly null effects that are nearly zero in magnitude. Our results contribute to a broad call for educational researchers to examine whether school reforms meaningfully affect student outcomes beyond short-term improvements in test scores.

American Educational Research JournalVol. 62(1)
North Carolina State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University of Delaware (US)
Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Walton Family Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do the Effects Persist? An Examination of Long-Term Effects After Students Leave Turnaround Schools — Ron Zimmer, Lam Pham, et al. · American Educational Research Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS