Does Language Ability Predict Natural Recovery From Stuttering?

Purpose: This review article examines the proposal that language ability is a predictor or associate of natural recovery from stuttering. Specifically, this is the claim that preschool children who stutter (CWS) but have strong language skills are more likely to recover from this disorder naturally (without professional treatment) than those who have weaker language skills. Method: Studies that investigated this proposal are described, and their findings are reported in an effort to achieve greater clarity regarding this claim. The review includes studies that were published in peer-reviewed research journals in English since 1996. Results: Collectively, studies of language ability and natural recovery from stuttering have yielded mixed results. Although some studies found evidence to support an association, others did not, and still others yielded only partial support. Possible explanations for the complex and inconsistent findings are discussed, and suggestions are offered for speech-language pathologists who work with CWS. Conclusions: Language ability in preschool children is not a consistent or robust predictor or associate of natural recovery from stuttering. For this reason, it is risky to assume that a young child who stutters but has strong language skills is likely to recover from stuttering naturally and therefore does not require professional treatment for this disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-24-00059
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Language Ability Predict Natural Recovery From Stuttering?

Marilyn A. Nippold
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Stuttering Research and Treatment
article

Does Language Ability Predict Natural Recovery From Stuttering?

Marilyn A. Nippold
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This review article examines the proposal that language ability is a predictor or associate of natural recovery from stuttering. Specifically, this is the claim that preschool children who stutter (CWS) but have strong language skills are more likely to recover from this disorder naturally (without professional treatment) than those who have weaker language skills. Method: Studies that investigated this proposal are described, and their findings are reported in an effort to achieve greater clarity regarding this claim. The review includes studies that were published in peer-reviewed research journals in English since 1996. Results: Collectively, studies of language ability and natural recovery from stuttering have yielded mixed results. Although some studies found evidence to support an association, others did not, and still others yielded only partial support. Possible explanations for the complex and inconsistent findings are discussed, and suggestions are offered for speech-language pathologists who work with CWS. Conclusions: Language ability in preschool children is not a consistent or robust predictor or associate of natural recovery from stuttering. For this reason, it is risky to assume that a young child who stutters but has strong language skills is likely to recover from stuttering naturally and therefore does not require professional treatment for this disorder.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest GroupsVol. 9(6)
University of Oregon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Stuttering Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.