Correct Compilation of Concurrent C Code

The CompCert compiler [Leroy et al. ERTS 2016] represents a landmark effort in program verification as both a piece of verified software and as a compiler for verified C programs. A key shortcoming of CompCert however is that it does not support multithreaded programs. Prior work to add threads to CompCert has either required major rewrites of parts of the proof [Ševčík et al. JACM 2013] or only works for well synchronized programs [Beringer et al. ESOP 2014]. The problem is that CompCert's backward simulation derives from a forward simulation via the determinism of the semantics of intermediate representation languages. This makes the proofs in CompCert easier but also makes them incompatible with standard models of multithreading which are non-deterministic. Here we propose an alternate formulation of CompCert's proof structure that parameterizes the existing single threaded semantics with nondeterministic behavior generated at the multithreading level. While this is an old trick where program equivalence is concerned, performing it in the context of CompCert is quite subtle. Our approach allows for expressive concurrent semantics and does not require major proof rewrites but still results in a global backward simulation for multithreaded programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3694848.3694856
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correct Compilation of Concurrent C Code

John Bender
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
article

Correct Compilation of Concurrent C Code

John Bender
article en

Abstract

The CompCert compiler [Leroy et al. ERTS 2016] represents a landmark effort in program verification as both a piece of verified software and as a compiler for verified C programs. A key shortcoming of CompCert however is that it does not support multithreaded programs. Prior work to add threads to CompCert has either required major rewrites of parts of the proof [Ševčík et al. JACM 2013] or only works for well synchronized programs [Beringer et al. ESOP 2014]. The problem is that CompCert's backward simulation derives from a forward simulation via the determinism of the semantics of intermediate representation languages. This makes the proofs in CompCert easier but also makes them incompatible with standard models of multithreading which are non-deterministic. Here we propose an alternate formulation of CompCert's proof structure that parameterizes the existing single threaded semantics with nondeterministic behavior generated at the multithreading level. While this is an old trick where program equivalence is concerned, performing it in the context of CompCert is quite subtle. Our approach allows for expressive concurrent semantics and does not require major proof rewrites but still results in a global backward simulation for multithreaded programs.

Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correct Compilation of Concurrent C Code — John Bender · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS