The Military Turn in Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutions and the Military in Authoritarian Regimes

Studies of constitutions in authoritarian regimes reveal a new finding hiding in plain sight: that the military is often a key constitutional actor. The question of how the military uses law and constitutions to enable and facilitate its influence in constitution making and constitutional practice is under-researched. The military demands scholarly attention because of the unprecedented opportunities for the military in governance due to the rise of populism and the decline of democracy, internal conflict, efforts at counter-terrorism and anti-trafficking, and the COVID-19 global pandemic. I review the literature across law and the social sciences on the constitution and the military in authoritarian regimes. In doing so, I demonstrate that the military is an important, yet overlooked, constitutional actor; that civilian control of the military by law is never absolute but a matter of degree and changes over time; and that histories of military rule and military use of law and constitutions matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041822-044807
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Military Turn in Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutions and the Military in Authoritarian Regimes

Melissa Crouch
1 citations
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
article

The Military Turn in Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutions and the Military in Authoritarian Regimes

Melissa Crouch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Studies of constitutions in authoritarian regimes reveal a new finding hiding in plain sight: that the military is often a key constitutional actor. The question of how the military uses law and constitutions to enable and facilitate its influence in constitution making and constitutional practice is under-researched. The military demands scholarly attention because of the unprecedented opportunities for the military in governance due to the rise of populism and the decline of democracy, internal conflict, efforts at counter-terrorism and anti-trafficking, and the COVID-19 global pandemic. I review the literature across law and the social sciences on the constitution and the military in authoritarian regimes. In doing so, I demonstrate that the military is an important, yet overlooked, constitutional actor; that civilian control of the military by law is never absolute but a matter of degree and changes over time; and that histories of military rule and military use of law and constitutions matter.

Annual Review of Law and Social ScienceVol. 20(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Military Turn in Comparative Constitutional Law: Constitutions and the Military in Authoritarian Regimes — Melissa Crouch · Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS