A Study on the Moderating Effect of Leisure Activity Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Job Stress and Quality of Life of Production Workers

Objectives The purpose of this study is to verify the moderating effect of leisure activity satisfaction in the relationship between job stress and quality of life of production workers. Methods For this purpose, an online survey was conducted targeting production workers at companies located in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, and 86 copies were used in the final statistical analysis. For the collected data, descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, and correlation analysis were conducted for each variable using SPSS 22.0, and the moderating effect was verified using Process Macro for SPSS V3.5 Model 1. Results First, the job stress of production workers was found to have a significant negative effect on their quality of life. Second, production workers' satisfaction with leisure activities was found to have a significant positive effect on their quality of life. Third, leisure activity satisfaction was found to moderate the relationship between job stress and quality of life of production workers. In addition, although leisure activity satisfaction moderates the relationship between job stress and quality of life, it was found that leisure activity satisfaction played a greater role in the group with low job stress than in the group with high job stress. Conclusions First, it is significant that it has been empirically confirmed that leisure activity satisfaction is an important regulating factor in the relationship between job stress, quality of life, and leisure activity satisfaction of production workers and in the relationship between job stress and quality of life of office workers. Second, by uncovering the major variables that affect the quality of life of production workers, it is meaningful in that it can provide basic data for early screening of office workers with low quality of life and effective intervention. Third, the results of this study provided implications for the development of counseling and education programs related to job stress and leisure activity satisfaction that can increase the quality of life of production workers, which are increasingly being emphasized.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.18.651
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Moderating Effect of Leisure Activity Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Job Stress and Quality of Life of Production Workers

Woongyong Choi, Yun‐Ju Lee, Hyunmi Cho
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

A Study on the Moderating Effect of Leisure Activity Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Job Stress and Quality of Life of Production Workers

Woongyong Choi, Yun‐Ju Lee, Hyunmi Cho
article en

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to verify the moderating effect of leisure activity satisfaction in the relationship between job stress and quality of life of production workers. Methods For this purpose, an online survey was conducted targeting production workers at companies located in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, and 86 copies were used in the final statistical analysis. For the collected data, descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, and correlation analysis were conducted for each variable using SPSS 22.0, and the moderating effect was verified using Process Macro for SPSS V3.5 Model 1. Results First, the job stress of production workers was found to have a significant negative effect on their quality of life. Second, production workers' satisfaction with leisure activities was found to have a significant positive effect on their quality of life. Third, leisure activity satisfaction was found to moderate the relationship between job stress and quality of life of production workers. In addition, although leisure activity satisfaction moderates the relationship between job stress and quality of life, it was found that leisure activity satisfaction played a greater role in the group with low job stress than in the group with high job stress. Conclusions First, it is significant that it has been empirically confirmed that leisure activity satisfaction is an important regulating factor in the relationship between job stress, quality of life, and leisure activity satisfaction of production workers and in the relationship between job stress and quality of life of office workers. Second, by uncovering the major variables that affect the quality of life of production workers, it is meaningful in that it can provide basic data for early screening of office workers with low quality of life and effective intervention. Third, the results of this study provided implications for the development of counseling and education programs related to job stress and leisure activity satisfaction that can increase the quality of life of production workers, which are increasingly being emphasized.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 24(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on the Moderating Effect of Leisure Activity Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Job Stress and Quality of Life of Production Workers — Woongyong Choi, Yun‐Ju Lee, et al. · Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS