Access to healthcare: underserved communities

Welcome to the final edition of the International Journal of Health Promotion and Education for 2024.In this issue, the Editorial team have looked back at the papers submitted across the Volume.In doing so, we found that we have had more papers published that employed quantitative methods than qualitative -and this surprised us!In terms of quantitative methods, most of the papers appeared to employ a mix of traditional inferential statistical tests (e.g.independent t-test or chi-square test) and logistic regressions.Importantly, good practice examples have emerged in relation to substantiating the choice of specific analytical aspects.This is the case of the article by Sui et al. in their analysis of Canadian university students' trait anxiety and nomophobia during COVID-19.In absence of theoretical grounds to guide the selection of the variables, the authors used backward stepwise selection to determine which independent variables would be eligible to enter the final model specification.Another way to guide model specification is adopted by Hall et al. by using hierarchical multiple regressions.This method underlines the authors' attention towards understanding the power of the independent variables of interest (i.e.specific drinking motives) in predicting drinking habits when socio-demographic variables are also controlled for.Besides establishing the model specification, considering how to best extract value from analysing the data on hand is equally important.In this sense, Gainer et al. enriched their analysis of depression and anxiety symptoms among U.S. physicians during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic by utilising multiple imputation to handle missing data.With this technique, the authors characterised the uncertainty around missing data points by estimating multiple plausible values derived from the distribution of the observed data.Overall, the variables' selection process guiding the model specification and the use of multiple imputation reflect the importance of examining and maximising the analytical value of the data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2024.2403238
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to healthcare: underserved communities

Michelle Baybutt, Sam Crossley
6 citations
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.78
article

Access to healthcare: underserved communities

Michelle Baybutt, Sam Crossley
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Welcome to the final edition of the International Journal of Health Promotion and Education for 2024.In this issue, the Editorial team have looked back at the papers submitted across the Volume.In doing so, we found that we have had more papers published that employed quantitative methods than qualitative -and this surprised us!In terms of quantitative methods, most of the papers appeared to employ a mix of traditional inferential statistical tests (e.g.independent t-test or chi-square test) and logistic regressions.Importantly, good practice examples have emerged in relation to substantiating the choice of specific analytical aspects.This is the case of the article by Sui et al. in their analysis of Canadian university students' trait anxiety and nomophobia during COVID-19.In absence of theoretical grounds to guide the selection of the variables, the authors used backward stepwise selection to determine which independent variables would be eligible to enter the final model specification.Another way to guide model specification is adopted by Hall et al. by using hierarchical multiple regressions.This method underlines the authors' attention towards understanding the power of the independent variables of interest (i.e.specific drinking motives) in predicting drinking habits when socio-demographic variables are also controlled for.Besides establishing the model specification, considering how to best extract value from analysing the data on hand is equally important.In this sense, Gainer et al. enriched their analysis of depression and anxiety symptoms among U.S. physicians during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic by utilising multiple imputation to handle missing data.With this technique, the authors characterised the uncertainty around missing data points by estimating multiple plausible values derived from the distribution of the observed data.Overall, the variables' selection process guiding the model specification and the use of multiple imputation reflect the importance of examining and maximising the analytical value of the data.

International Journal of Health Promotion and EducationVol. 62(5)
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Lancashire (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.