Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Given the rapid uptake of CGM in pregnancies complicated by both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, our objective was to determine if CGM satisfaction and use differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Cross-sectional survey study of 100 patients with pregestational diabetes who used Dexcom G6 CGM during pregnancy and received prenatal care at a single tertiary care center. Participants completed the validated 15-question Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) and other questions about CGM use. The primary outcome was high satisfaction with CGM, defined as a total GMSS score of 4 or greater. Secondary outcomes included GMSS subscales, frequency of CGM app use, and CGM features used. Outcomes were compared between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and logistic and ordinal regression estimated the association between type 2 diabetes and outcomes.Of 100 surveyed patients, 45 had type 1 and 55 had type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to use CGM before pregnancy and use an insulin pump. CGM satisfaction did not differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (74.5 vs. 56.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.54, 95% [confidence interval] CI: 0.21-1.36). High openness, low behavioral burden, low emotional burden, and high worthwhileness also did not differ between groups after adjustment for CGM use before pregnancy. Reported CGM app use was high and did not differ between groups. Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to use arrows and/or graphs on the CGM app compared to type 1 diabetes.In this cohort, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to be similarly satisfied with CGM compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Future efforts focused on CGM education for new users may help increase the use of CGM app features, maximize satisfaction, and minimize technology burden. · CGM satisfaction was similar between pregnant patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.. · Patients with both diabetes types thought that CGM was worthwhile and of low burden during pregnancy.. · Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to report using CGM features during pregnancy..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2442-7090
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Kevin S. Shrestha, Ashley N. Battarbee
2 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
1.17
article

Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Kevin S. Shrestha, Ashley N. Battarbee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Given the rapid uptake of CGM in pregnancies complicated by both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, our objective was to determine if CGM satisfaction and use differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Cross-sectional survey study of 100 patients with pregestational diabetes who used Dexcom G6 CGM during pregnancy and received prenatal care at a single tertiary care center. Participants completed the validated 15-question Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) and other questions about CGM use. The primary outcome was high satisfaction with CGM, defined as a total GMSS score of 4 or greater. Secondary outcomes included GMSS subscales, frequency of CGM app use, and CGM features used. Outcomes were compared between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and logistic and ordinal regression estimated the association between type 2 diabetes and outcomes.Of 100 surveyed patients, 45 had type 1 and 55 had type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to use CGM before pregnancy and use an insulin pump. CGM satisfaction did not differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (74.5 vs. 56.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.54, 95% [confidence interval] CI: 0.21-1.36). High openness, low behavioral burden, low emotional burden, and high worthwhileness also did not differ between groups after adjustment for CGM use before pregnancy. Reported CGM app use was high and did not differ between groups. Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to use arrows and/or graphs on the CGM app compared to type 1 diabetes.In this cohort, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to be similarly satisfied with CGM compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Future efforts focused on CGM education for new users may help increase the use of CGM app features, maximize satisfaction, and minimize technology burden. · CGM satisfaction was similar between pregnant patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.. · Patients with both diabetes types thought that CGM was worthwhile and of low burden during pregnancy.. · Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to report using CGM features during pregnancy..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(10)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.