Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing

Findings show that bias can emerge in upstream (research and development) and downstream (medicine production) processes when manufacturing targeted medicines. However, interviewees emphasized that downstream processes, particularly those not relying on patient or population data, may have lower bias risks. The study also identified a spectrum of bias meanings ranging from negative and ambivalent to positive and productive. Notably, some participants highlighted the potential for certain biases to have productive moral value in correcting health inequalities. This idea of "corrective bias" problematizes the conventional understanding of bias as primarily a negative concept defined by systematic error or unfair outcomes and suggests potential value in capitalizing on biases to help address health inequalities. Our analysis also indicates, however, that the concept of "corrective bias" requires further critical reflection before they can be used to this end.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01112-1
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing

Francis McKay, Ngozi Nwebonyi
9 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.08
article

Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing

Francis McKay, Ngozi Nwebonyi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Findings show that bias can emerge in upstream (research and development) and downstream (medicine production) processes when manufacturing targeted medicines. However, interviewees emphasized that downstream processes, particularly those not relying on patient or population data, may have lower bias risks. The study also identified a spectrum of bias meanings ranging from negative and ambivalent to positive and productive. Notably, some participants highlighted the potential for certain biases to have productive moral value in correcting health inequalities. This idea of "corrective bias" problematizes the conventional understanding of bias as primarily a negative concept defined by systematic error or unfair outcomes and suggests potential value in capitalizing on biases to help address health inequalities. Our analysis also indicates, however, that the concept of "corrective bias" requires further critical reflection before they can be used to this end.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 25(1)
Southmead Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
University of Oxford, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing — Francis McKay, Ngozi Nwebonyi · BMC Medical Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS