Exploring bias risks in artificial intelligence and targeted medicines manufacturing
Findings show that bias can emerge in upstream (research and development) and downstream (medicine production) processes when manufacturing targeted medicines. However, interviewees emphasized that downstream processes, particularly those not relying on patient or population data, may have lower bias risks. The study also identified a spectrum of bias meanings ranging from negative and ambivalent to positive and productive. Notably, some participants highlighted the potential for certain biases to have productive moral value in correcting health inequalities. This idea of "corrective bias" problematizes the conventional understanding of bias as primarily a negative concept defined by systematic error or unfair outcomes and suggests potential value in capitalizing on biases to help address health inequalities. Our analysis also indicates, however, that the concept of "corrective bias" requires further critical reflection before they can be used to this end.
Authors
- Francis McKay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-9446)
- Ngozi Nwebonyi
Institutions
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2024-10-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01112-1
- Citations
- 9
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.08
Funders
- University of Oxford
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council