Misconceptions about Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries among Health Care Professionals in a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury is a neurological condition that affects millions of people every year and is a serious health concern- insufficient knowledge about traumatic brain injury held by both the general population and medical experts. Healthcare professionals who treat patients with TBI seem to have a general lack of understanding and misconceptions regarding brain injuries. Addressing and reducing TBI-related misunderstandings in clinical practices requires a grasp of basic concepts. Aim and Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the misconceptions about severe traumatic brain injury among health care professionals (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists) in a tertiary care centre. Method: This is a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 120 healthcare professionals was employed. Participants in the study were ensured that healthcare professionals had sufficient exposure to TBI. The purpose of the 40-item selfreport questionnaire, the CM-TBI, was to measure respondents’ understanding of TBI, its consequences, and rehabilitation. Result: The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the groups regarding the assumption that recovery from a brain injury takes around five months (Chi-Square = 8.454, df = 2, p = 0.015). Similarly, the belief that a person who has a brain injury ‘just like new’ in several months also shows significant differences among the health care professional groups (Chi-Square = 25.860, df = 2, p = 0.000). Unexpectedly, replies from health care professionals to certain questions, such whether or not seatbelt use prevents more injuries than it causes or whether it is safer to be trapped within an accident than to be thrown clear, do not significantly differ from one another. Conclusion: Professional background may influence perceptions, emphasizing the importance of tailored educational interventions within each professional group to address potential misconceptions and enhance knowledge about severe traumatic brain injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2024/43923
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misconceptions about Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries among Health Care Professionals in a Tertiary Care Center

Abdur Raheem Khan, Neera Sah, Himani Rathi
Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Misconceptions about Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries among Health Care Professionals in a Tertiary Care Center

Abdur Raheem Khan, Neera Sah, Himani Rathi
article en

Abstract

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury is a neurological condition that affects millions of people every year and is a serious health concern- insufficient knowledge about traumatic brain injury held by both the general population and medical experts. Healthcare professionals who treat patients with TBI seem to have a general lack of understanding and misconceptions regarding brain injuries. Addressing and reducing TBI-related misunderstandings in clinical practices requires a grasp of basic concepts. Aim and Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the misconceptions about severe traumatic brain injury among health care professionals (physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists) in a tertiary care centre. Method: This is a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 120 healthcare professionals was employed. Participants in the study were ensured that healthcare professionals had sufficient exposure to TBI. The purpose of the 40-item selfreport questionnaire, the CM-TBI, was to measure respondents’ understanding of TBI, its consequences, and rehabilitation. Result: The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the groups regarding the assumption that recovery from a brain injury takes around five months (Chi-Square = 8.454, df = 2, p = 0.015). Similarly, the belief that a person who has a brain injury ‘just like new’ in several months also shows significant differences among the health care professional groups (Chi-Square = 25.860, df = 2, p = 0.000). Unexpectedly, replies from health care professionals to certain questions, such whether or not seatbelt use prevents more injuries than it causes or whether it is safer to be trapped within an accident than to be thrown clear, do not significantly differ from one another. Conclusion: Professional background may influence perceptions, emphasizing the importance of tailored educational interventions within each professional group to address potential misconceptions and enhance knowledge about severe traumatic brain injuries.

Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health
Teerthanker Mahaveer University (IN), Integral University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.