Contrasting patterns of differentiation among three taxa of the rapidly diversifying orchid genus <i>Ophrys</i> sect. <i>Insectifera</i> (Orchidaceae) where their ranges overlap

Abstract In rapidly diversifying groups, taxa defined on the basis of typological criteria can be difficult to support with genetic data. The diversity observed in the insect-mimicking orchid genus Ophrys perfectly illustrates this situation; among 400 described species only 9–10 lineages are detectable by genetic markers such as nrITS. The three taxa described in the Ophrys insectifera group, O. insectifera, O. subinsectifera, and O. aymoninii, can be clearly distinguished by their flowers, which have evolved different phenotypes as a result of adaptation to specific pollinator insect species from three different families. However, genetic differentiation between these three taxa has never been really supported by population genetic data and their taxonomic status is still debated. Using population genomic approaches, we found a clustering consistent with the existence of three genetic entities where the geographic distributions of the three taxa overlap. Two of these clusters correspond to France populations of the widespread O. insectifera and the micro-endemic O. aymoninii. However, the last cluster grouped together all the Iberian individuals, suggesting that individuals phenotypically identified as either O. insectifera or O. subinsectifera are genetically weakly differentiated there. Populations of the two pairs of taxa thus may have experienced different patterns of inter-specific gene flow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boae062
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting patterns of differentiation among three taxa of the rapidly diversifying orchid genus Ophrys sect. Insectifera (Orchidaceae) where their ranges overlap

Joris A. M. Bertrand, David Vilasís, Roselyne Buscail, Pascaline Salvado et al.
2 citations
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
Plant and animal studies
2.06
article

Contrasting patterns of differentiation among three taxa of the rapidly diversifying orchid genus Ophrys sect. Insectifera (Orchidaceae) where their ranges overlap

Joris A. M. Bertrand, David Vilasís, Roselyne Buscail, Pascaline Salvado, Bertrand Schatz, Philippe Feldmann, Anaïs Gibert, Lucas Vandenabeele
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In rapidly diversifying groups, taxa defined on the basis of typological criteria can be difficult to support with genetic data. The diversity observed in the insect-mimicking orchid genus Ophrys perfectly illustrates this situation; among 400 described species only 9–10 lineages are detectable by genetic markers such as nrITS. The three taxa described in the Ophrys insectifera group, O. insectifera, O. subinsectifera, and O. aymoninii, can be clearly distinguished by their flowers, which have evolved different phenotypes as a result of adaptation to specific pollinator insect species from three different families. However, genetic differentiation between these three taxa has never been really supported by population genetic data and their taxonomic status is still debated. Using population genomic approaches, we found a clustering consistent with the existence of three genetic entities where the geographic distributions of the three taxa overlap. Two of these clusters correspond to France populations of the widespread O. insectifera and the micro-endemic O. aymoninii. However, the last cluster grouped together all the Iberian individuals, suggesting that individuals phenotypically identified as either O. insectifera or O. subinsectifera are genetically weakly differentiated there. Populations of the two pairs of taxa thus may have experienced different patterns of inter-specific gene flow.

Botanical Journal of the Linnean SocietyVol. 208(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Perpignan (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) (MA), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (FR), Laboratoire Génome et Développement des Plantes (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Johns Hopkins University, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant and animal studies
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.