A Phantom Study of Optimal Examination Conditions for Ankle CT: Focusing on Noise and Sharpness

CT scans utilize relatively higher levels of radiation compared to conventional X-ray examinations. To address this issue and optimize imaging outcomes, various technologies have been developed, among which Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) represents a significant advancement. AEC is particularly effective in areas with considerable thickness variations, such as the thorax or abdomen; however, it may result in unnecessary radiation exposure in smaller anatomical structures, such as the extremities, which can compromise image quality. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the contrast resolution and spatial resolution under fixed tube current conditions in ankle CT scans, with the aim of identifying the optimal tube current settings. The methodology involved using a phantom to conduct scans across a range of tube currents, starting at 50 mAs and increasing in increments of 50 mAs up to 250 mAs, followed by image acquisition for subsequent analysis. Contrast resolution was assessed using Noise and Contrastto- Noise Ratio (CNR), while spatial resolution was evaluated by obtaining line profiles at the bone edges of the ankle. Measurements of angle and distance were recorded at the 25% and 75% density value points on the y-axis to facilitate comparisons of spatial resolution. The results revealed significant differences in contrast resolution between the 50 mAs and 250 mAs settings, with smaller differences noted between the 100 mAs to 150 mAs and 200 mAs to 250 mAs comparisons. Regarding spatial resolution, the most pronounced difference was observed between the 50 mAs and 100 mAs settings, with diminishing differences noted beyond the 150 mAs threshold. Consequently, image quality improved with each 50 mAs increment up to 200 mAs, with negligible differences observed between images acquired at 150 mAs and 200 mAs. These findings suggest that a tube current setting of 150 mAs may be optimal for achieving high-quality imaging while minimizing radiation exposure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Daehan CT yeongsang gisul hakoeji
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31320/jksct.2024.26.2.53
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phantom Study of Optimal Examination Conditions for Ankle CT: Focusing on Noise and Sharpness

Ki Baek Lee, Jong-Tae Yoon, Woodon Jeong, R. Kang et al.
Daehan CT yeongsang gisul hakoeji
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

A Phantom Study of Optimal Examination Conditions for Ankle CT: Focusing on Noise and Sharpness

Ki Baek Lee, Jong-Tae Yoon, Woodon Jeong, R. Kang, Sung-Il Kang
article en

Abstract

CT scans utilize relatively higher levels of radiation compared to conventional X-ray examinations. To address this issue and optimize imaging outcomes, various technologies have been developed, among which Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) represents a significant advancement. AEC is particularly effective in areas with considerable thickness variations, such as the thorax or abdomen; however, it may result in unnecessary radiation exposure in smaller anatomical structures, such as the extremities, which can compromise image quality. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the contrast resolution and spatial resolution under fixed tube current conditions in ankle CT scans, with the aim of identifying the optimal tube current settings. The methodology involved using a phantom to conduct scans across a range of tube currents, starting at 50 mAs and increasing in increments of 50 mAs up to 250 mAs, followed by image acquisition for subsequent analysis. Contrast resolution was assessed using Noise and Contrastto- Noise Ratio (CNR), while spatial resolution was evaluated by obtaining line profiles at the bone edges of the ankle. Measurements of angle and distance were recorded at the 25% and 75% density value points on the y-axis to facilitate comparisons of spatial resolution. The results revealed significant differences in contrast resolution between the 50 mAs and 250 mAs settings, with smaller differences noted between the 100 mAs to 150 mAs and 200 mAs to 250 mAs comparisons. Regarding spatial resolution, the most pronounced difference was observed between the 50 mAs and 100 mAs settings, with diminishing differences noted beyond the 150 mAs threshold. Consequently, image quality improved with each 50 mAs increment up to 200 mAs, with negligible differences observed between images acquired at 150 mAs and 200 mAs. These findings suggest that a tube current setting of 150 mAs may be optimal for achieving high-quality imaging while minimizing radiation exposure.

Daehan CT yeongsang gisul hakoejiVol. 26(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.