“Back Then,” “Around Here,” and “Down the Road”: Proximity, Recursivity, and the Present Future in Transplantation

In this article, I examine the themes of proximity, recursivity, and the present future in transplant, with special attention to the perspectives and experiences shared by rural interlocutors during ethnographic fieldwork carried out during twenty-four non-consecutive months from 2007 to 2010 in the Midwest region of the United States. By revisiting from today’s vantage point a set of data gathered years ago, and suggesting the Möbius strip as a helpful model, I offer an examination of recursivity in transplantation that is itself born out of a recursive approach to research and analysis. Throughout, I draw upon and analyze data that were gathered through participant observation and qualitative ethnographic interviews with transplant patients and loved ones residing in rural areas, where interlocutors’ insights regarding their temporal and spatial movement in relation to transplantation index some of its frictions of futurity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v10i1.41817
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Back Then,” “Around Here,” and “Down the Road”: Proximity, Recursivity, and the Present Future in Transplantation

Laura Heinemann
1 citations
Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience
Organ Donation and Transplantation
0.54
article

“Back Then,” “Around Here,” and “Down the Road”: Proximity, Recursivity, and the Present Future in Transplantation

Laura Heinemann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, I examine the themes of proximity, recursivity, and the present future in transplant, with special attention to the perspectives and experiences shared by rural interlocutors during ethnographic fieldwork carried out during twenty-four non-consecutive months from 2007 to 2010 in the Midwest region of the United States. By revisiting from today’s vantage point a set of data gathered years ago, and suggesting the Möbius strip as a helpful model, I offer an examination of recursivity in transplantation that is itself born out of a recursive approach to research and analysis. Throughout, I draw upon and analyze data that were gathered through participant observation and qualitative ethnographic interviews with transplant patients and loved ones residing in rural areas, where interlocutors’ insights regarding their temporal and spatial movement in relation to transplantation index some of its frictions of futurity.

Catalyst Feminism Theory TechnoscienceVol. 10(1)
Creighton University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.