Crisis of the Pseudoreal

This article discusses the history of film ontology and advocates to shift from traditional film interpretations to understanding all images as pseudoreal. Historically, film and images have been understood with an inherent connection to pro-filmic reality: the captured image represented what was in front of the camera at some point in time. While theories of how to retain a sense of film realism have evolved as the processes for capturing and altering images have improved, a proclivity towards the real has been maintained throughout most image interpretation techniques. Due to technological advancements in creating and altering images, the distinction between real and artificial within images has vanished; audiences cannot distinguish what is real or artificial within images. Consequently, the film-image will now be considered pseudoreal; images must be interpreted as completely severed from a relationship with pro-filmic reality. All images must now be understood with deference to the possibility that any or all of the image could be artificial. The first impulse to understanding images in the modern world should be to acknowledge that there is no inherent connection between an image and the real.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Film and Philosophy
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/filmphil2024101533
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis of the Pseudoreal

Shaler Keenum
Film and Philosophy
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Crisis of the Pseudoreal

Shaler Keenum
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the history of film ontology and advocates to shift from traditional film interpretations to understanding all images as pseudoreal. Historically, film and images have been understood with an inherent connection to pro-filmic reality: the captured image represented what was in front of the camera at some point in time. While theories of how to retain a sense of film realism have evolved as the processes for capturing and altering images have improved, a proclivity towards the real has been maintained throughout most image interpretation techniques. Due to technological advancements in creating and altering images, the distinction between real and artificial within images has vanished; audiences cannot distinguish what is real or artificial within images. Consequently, the film-image will now be considered pseudoreal; images must be interpreted as completely severed from a relationship with pro-filmic reality. All images must now be understood with deference to the possibility that any or all of the image could be artificial. The first impulse to understanding images in the modern world should be to acknowledge that there is no inherent connection between an image and the real.

Film and PhilosophyVol. 29
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.