Academic Management in Chilean Universities: An Analysis From Academics' Perspective

ABSTRACT This article analyses academics' perceptions of work management and their job satisfaction in Chilean universities, using a multi‐level approach (macro, meso and micro) to study changes in the academic environment. It is based on the survey ‘The Academic Profession in the Knowledge‐Based Society’ (APIKS) with data from 11 universities and 1258 valid responses. Three groups of academics are identified according to whether they are engaged in research, teaching or a balance of both. The results of the study show that, at the university level, resource allocation favours teaching, while individual recognition tends to favour research. Institutionally, teaching is prioritised because of its economic impact, but individually, research is more highly valued. This picture reflects a hybrid management model, with tendencies towards de‐professionalisation in teaching and entrepreneurialisation in research. Despite these pressures, academics report high levels of job satisfaction, an aspect that requires further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12798
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic Management in Chilean Universities: An Analysis From Academics' Perspective

José Joaquín Brunner, Mario Alarcón
2 citations
European Journal of Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
4.46
article

Academic Management in Chilean Universities: An Analysis From Academics' Perspective

José Joaquín Brunner, Mario Alarcón
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses academics' perceptions of work management and their job satisfaction in Chilean universities, using a multi‐level approach (macro, meso and micro) to study changes in the academic environment. It is based on the survey ‘The Academic Profession in the Knowledge‐Based Society’ (APIKS) with data from 11 universities and 1258 valid responses. Three groups of academics are identified according to whether they are engaged in research, teaching or a balance of both. The results of the study show that, at the university level, resource allocation favours teaching, while individual recognition tends to favour research. Institutionally, teaching is prioritised because of its economic impact, but individually, research is more highly valued. This picture reflects a hybrid management model, with tendencies towards de‐professionalisation in teaching and entrepreneurialisation in research. Despite these pressures, academics report high levels of job satisfaction, an aspect that requires further research.

European Journal of EducationVol. 59(4)
Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Higher Education Governance and Development
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.