Development and validation of the Abolitionist Ideology Scale with abolitionist‐identifying and nationally representative samples

Abstract Building upon recent calls for the integration of abolition into psychology, we develop and validate a measure of Abolitionist Ideology. In two studies with abolitionist leaning ( N = 201, abolitionist‐identifying n = 58) and nationally representative ( N = 350) samples, we identify and confirm a three‐factor, 26‐item measure including subscales of Alternatives to State Violence, Revolutionary Abolitionism, and Abolitionist Identity. The Abolitionist Ideology Scale demonstrates convergent validity with measures including support for Black Lives Matter, critical consciousness, openness to experience, radical imagination, and attribution of violence to the state. The scale demonstrates divergent validity from measures including social dominance orientation (SDO) and political conservatism. Finally, the scale predicted activism tenacity above and beyond a related measure of carceral system justification. The Abolitionist Ideology Scale demonstrates initial reliability and validity and will be useful for those aiming to engage abolition in liberatory theory, research, and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12430
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the Abolitionist Ideology Scale with abolitionist‐identifying and nationally representative samples

Minh Duc Pham, Flora Oswald, Kimberly E. Chaney
5 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
5.66
article

Development and validation of the Abolitionist Ideology Scale with abolitionist‐identifying and nationally representative samples

Minh Duc Pham, Flora Oswald, Kimberly E. Chaney
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Building upon recent calls for the integration of abolition into psychology, we develop and validate a measure of Abolitionist Ideology. In two studies with abolitionist leaning ( N = 201, abolitionist‐identifying n = 58) and nationally representative ( N = 350) samples, we identify and confirm a three‐factor, 26‐item measure including subscales of Alternatives to State Violence, Revolutionary Abolitionism, and Abolitionist Identity. The Abolitionist Ideology Scale demonstrates convergent validity with measures including support for Black Lives Matter, critical consciousness, openness to experience, radical imagination, and attribution of violence to the state. The scale demonstrates divergent validity from measures including social dominance orientation (SDO) and political conservatism. Finally, the scale predicted activism tenacity above and beyond a related measure of carceral system justification. The Abolitionist Ideology Scale demonstrates initial reliability and validity and will be useful for those aiming to engage abolition in liberatory theory, research, and practice.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(1)
University of Connecticut (US), University of South Carolina (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.