Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language

We investigated syntactic priming in German children to explore crosslinguistic evidence for implicit learning accounts of language production and acquisition. Adult descriptions confirmed that German speakers (N=27) preferred to spontaneously produce active versus passive transitive and DO versus PO dative forms. We tested whether German-speaking children (N=29, M <sub><i>age</i></sub> =5.3, 15 girls/14 boys) could be primed to produce these dispreferred forms and whether such priming effects would persist across a target phase. Children first heard a block of priming sentences and then described a block of target pictures. They demonstrated significant priming effects for passive and PO dative structures, and these priming effects did not differ between the first and second halves of the block of target trials. These patterns of German child language production are consistent with implicit learning accounts of syntactic priming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Child Language
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000924000369
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language

Katherine Messenger, Michelle Tafuri
1 citations
Journal of Child Language
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
article

Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language

Katherine Messenger, Michelle Tafuri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We investigated syntactic priming in German children to explore crosslinguistic evidence for implicit learning accounts of language production and acquisition. Adult descriptions confirmed that German speakers (N=27) preferred to spontaneously produce active versus passive transitive and DO versus PO dative forms. We tested whether German-speaking children (N=29, M <sub><i>age</i></sub> =5.3, 15 girls/14 boys) could be primed to produce these dispreferred forms and whether such priming effects would persist across a target phase. Children first heard a block of priming sentences and then described a block of target pictures. They demonstrated significant priming effects for passive and PO dative structures, and these priming effects did not differ between the first and second halves of the block of target trials. These patterns of German child language production are consistent with implicit learning accounts of syntactic priming.

Journal of Child LanguageVol. 52(5)
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Warwick (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Syntactic priming as implicit learning in German child language — Katherine Messenger, Michelle Tafuri · Journal of Child Language (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS