Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using the I2 Test

I<sup>2</sup> testing with trial-adjusted SCT settings increased the odds of identifying selection bias in clinical trials and did not significantly alter the odds in smaller trials with fewer than 200 patients per intervention group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71668
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using the I2 Test

Steffen Mickenautsch, Veerasamy Yengopal
2 citations
Cureus
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
1.42
article

Trial-Adjusted Versus Generic Simulated Comparator Trial (SCT) Settings for Selection Bias Appraisal Using the I2 Test

Steffen Mickenautsch, Veerasamy Yengopal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

I<sup>2</sup> testing with trial-adjusted SCT settings increased the odds of identifying selection bias in clinical trials and did not significantly alter the odds in smaller trials with fewer than 200 patients per intervention group.

CureusVol. 16(10)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.