What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education

The concept of 'audience' is central to research and practice in science communication. When asked by a scientist for help communicating their work, who among us has not responded with the time honoured question 'who is your audience?' Yet what we mean when we talk about audience is not always clear: implied and ambiguous, rather than explicit and precise. This article explores this ambiguity, drawing on a systematic review of 1360 science communication research articles and a survey of 45 science communication educators. We report 10 different conceptualisations, in three groups. <i>Being</i> conceptualisations include 'Demographic', 'Knowledge', 'Values' and 'Embodied'; <i>Doing</i> conceptualisations include 'Interaction' and 'Dynamic'. In <i>Qualifiers</i>, we found 'Diverse', 'Potential', 'Plural' and 'General' conceptualisations. These data allow tracking of how we have conceptualised audience over time, an understanding of the groups systematically under-serviced, and a pathway to a richer discussion of this key concept for our field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241280349
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education

E. Doyle McCarthy, Will Grant
5 citations
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
5.66
article

What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education

E. Doyle McCarthy, Will Grant
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The concept of 'audience' is central to research and practice in science communication. When asked by a scientist for help communicating their work, who among us has not responded with the time honoured question 'who is your audience?' Yet what we mean when we talk about audience is not always clear: implied and ambiguous, rather than explicit and precise. This article explores this ambiguity, drawing on a systematic review of 1360 science communication research articles and a survey of 45 science communication educators. We report 10 different conceptualisations, in three groups. <i>Being</i> conceptualisations include 'Demographic', 'Knowledge', 'Values' and 'Embodied'; <i>Doing</i> conceptualisations include 'Interaction' and 'Dynamic'. In <i>Qualifiers</i>, we found 'Diverse', 'Potential', 'Plural' and 'General' conceptualisations. These data allow tracking of how we have conceptualised audience over time, an understanding of the groups systematically under-serviced, and a pathway to a richer discussion of this key concept for our field.

Public Understanding of ScienceVol. 34(4)
Australian National University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.