Inequality perception and preferences globally and locally - correlational evidence from a large-scale cross-country survey

Abstract Using a large, representative survey involving 31 countries, we establish stylized facts about the attitudes toward cross-country economic inequality and their correlates. This question has been surprisingly understudied for a topic so important to our globalized $$21^{st}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>21</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>st</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> century. We present a simple and intuitive theoretical framework for thinking about cross-country inequalities. Then, we show that people’s perceived and desired levels of domestic inequality and their assessment of their relative socio-economic status closely correlate with how they think about cross-country economic differences. The objective socio-economic status of the individual matters less. Though the impact of country-level variables is less pronounced than individual characteristics, concern about cross-country economic inequality is stronger in more affluent countries and countries with lower income inequality. Our findings illustrate that attitudes toward international economic inequality are intrinsically linked to within-country characteristics, especially to attitudes toward domestic economic inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Economic Inequality
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-024-09647-4
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequality perception and preferences globally and locally - correlational evidence from a large-scale cross-country survey

Attila Gáspár, Federica Durante, Carmen Cervone, Anne Maass et al.
4 citations
The Journal of Economic Inequality
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
1.29
article

Inequality perception and preferences globally and locally - correlational evidence from a large-scale cross-country survey

Attila Gáspár, Federica Durante, Carmen Cervone, Anne Maass, Roberta Rosa Valtorta, Caterina Suitner, Michela Vezzoli
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using a large, representative survey involving 31 countries, we establish stylized facts about the attitudes toward cross-country economic inequality and their correlates. This question has been surprisingly understudied for a topic so important to our globalized $$21^{st}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>21</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>st</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> century. We present a simple and intuitive theoretical framework for thinking about cross-country inequalities. Then, we show that people’s perceived and desired levels of domestic inequality and their assessment of their relative socio-economic status closely correlate with how they think about cross-country economic differences. The objective socio-economic status of the individual matters less. Though the impact of country-level variables is less pronounced than individual characteristics, concern about cross-country economic inequality is stronger in more affluent countries and countries with lower income inequality. Our findings illustrate that attitudes toward international economic inequality are intrinsically linked to within-country characteristics, especially to attitudes toward domestic economic inequality.

The Journal of Economic InequalityVol. 23(2)
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), University of Padua (IT), ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.