Modalities of Mediation: Reflections on a Dispute System Design Project During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT This Practice Insight presents a reflective analysis of a collaborative project launched in early 2020, initially aimed at comparing in‐person, video, and telephone mediation modalities. That project shifted its focus to the implementation of remote mediation through videoconferencing during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Through firsthand experiences and observations, this essay offers a unique, dual perspective: from within a U.S. Federal agency managing an established mediation program through the pandemic, and from within an academic clinic engaged in dispute systems design. These reflections on the 2020 project and its aftermath illuminate the challenges and learnings from transitioning to remote mediation, offering insights into adapting dispute resolution mechanisms to unforeseen circumstances and how technological change can spur new insights into general practices of mediation. This work not only contributes to the understanding of mediation modalities today but also underscores the importance of flexibility and innovation in dispute system design during crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21449
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modalities of Mediation: Reflections on a Dispute System Design Project During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Jane Juliano, Andrew Mamo
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Modalities of Mediation: Reflections on a Dispute System Design Project During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Jane Juliano, Andrew Mamo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Practice Insight presents a reflective analysis of a collaborative project launched in early 2020, initially aimed at comparing in‐person, video, and telephone mediation modalities. That project shifted its focus to the implementation of remote mediation through videoconferencing during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Through firsthand experiences and observations, this essay offers a unique, dual perspective: from within a U.S. Federal agency managing an established mediation program through the pandemic, and from within an academic clinic engaged in dispute systems design. These reflections on the 2020 project and its aftermath illuminate the challenges and learnings from transitioning to remote mediation, offering insights into adapting dispute resolution mechanisms to unforeseen circumstances and how technological change can spur new insights into general practices of mediation. This work not only contributes to the understanding of mediation modalities today but also underscores the importance of flexibility and innovation in dispute system design during crises.

Conflict Resolution QuarterlyVol. 42(3)
Georgetown University (US), Office of the General Counsel (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.