Overall Survival in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib or Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy: Findings from the National Veterans Health Administration Database

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study evaluated comparative overall survival (OS) of United States veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib or lenvatinib, overall and across racial and ethnic groups. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, patients with uHCC who initiated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (post-2020) or sorafenib or lenvatinib (post-2018) were identified from the Veterans Health Administration National Corporate Data Warehouse (1 January 2017-31 December 2022). Patient characteristics were evaluated in the year prior to 1L treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression methods were used to compare OS starting from treatment between cohorts, both overall and by race and ethnicity. <b>Results:</b> Among the 1874 patients included, 405 (21.6%) received 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1016 (54.2%) received sorafenib, and 453 (24.2%) received lenvatinib, with a median follow-up time of 8.5, 7.6, and 8.2 months, respectively. Overall, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer unadjusted median OS (12.8 [95% CI: 10.6, 17.1] months) than patients receiving sorafenib (8.0 [7.1, 8.6] months) or lenvatinib (9.5 [7.8, 11.4] months; both log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.001). After adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a reduced risk of death by 30% vs. sorafenib (adjusted HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]) and by 26% vs. lenvatinib (0.74 [0.62, 0.88]; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). OS trends in the White, Black, and Hispanic patient cohorts were consistent with that of the overall population. <b>Conclusions:</b> Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with uHCC, both overall and across racial and ethnic subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16203508
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overall Survival in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib or Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy: Findings from the National Veterans Health Administration Database

Amit G. Singal, Cheryl Xiang, Sarika Ogale, Ruoding Tan et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
0.74
article

Overall Survival in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib or Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy: Findings from the National Veterans Health Administration Database

Amit G. Singal, Cheryl Xiang, Sarika Ogale, Ruoding Tan, Lizheng Shi, Fan Mu, Yilu Lin, Jiayang Li, David E. Kaplan, Sairy Hernandez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study evaluated comparative overall survival (OS) of United States veterans with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving first-line (1L) atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib or lenvatinib, overall and across racial and ethnic groups. <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, patients with uHCC who initiated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (post-2020) or sorafenib or lenvatinib (post-2018) were identified from the Veterans Health Administration National Corporate Data Warehouse (1 January 2017-31 December 2022). Patient characteristics were evaluated in the year prior to 1L treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression methods were used to compare OS starting from treatment between cohorts, both overall and by race and ethnicity. <b>Results:</b> Among the 1874 patients included, 405 (21.6%) received 1L atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 1016 (54.2%) received sorafenib, and 453 (24.2%) received lenvatinib, with a median follow-up time of 8.5, 7.6, and 8.2 months, respectively. Overall, patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had longer unadjusted median OS (12.8 [95% CI: 10.6, 17.1] months) than patients receiving sorafenib (8.0 [7.1, 8.6] months) or lenvatinib (9.5 [7.8, 11.4] months; both log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.001). After adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a reduced risk of death by 30% vs. sorafenib (adjusted HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60, 0.82]) and by 26% vs. lenvatinib (0.74 [0.62, 0.88]; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). OS trends in the White, Black, and Hispanic patient cohorts were consistent with that of the overall population. <b>Conclusions:</b> Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with improved survival outcomes compared with sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with uHCC, both overall and across racial and ethnic subgroups.

CancersVol. 16(20)
Tulane University (US), University Medical Center New Orleans (US), Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.