Aspects of Quality of Life: Single vs. Mated People

Not having an intimate partner constitutes a common state in contemporary post-industrial societies. The current research aimed to address the question of whether single people score higher than mated people in various dimensions of quality of life. For this purpose, we employed quantitative research methods, measuring different aspects of quality of life that we treated as the dependent variables, with relationship status as the independent variable. In a sample of 1929 participants from Greece and Turkey, we found that relationship status was not significantly associated with physical health, relationships with friends and family, self-development, independence, recreation, or participation in social and communal activities. On the other hand, it was significantly associated with material goods, disposable income, social support, sexual satisfaction, and having children, with mated people scoring higher than single people. Despite using different methodologies for data collection, similar results were obtained in the two cultural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100954
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aspects of Quality of Life: Single vs. Mated People

Menelaos Apostolou, Timo Lajunen, Burcu Tekeş, Antonios Kagialis
4 citations
Behavioral Sciences
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.03
article

Aspects of Quality of Life: Single vs. Mated People

Menelaos Apostolou, Timo Lajunen, Burcu Tekeş, Antonios Kagialis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Not having an intimate partner constitutes a common state in contemporary post-industrial societies. The current research aimed to address the question of whether single people score higher than mated people in various dimensions of quality of life. For this purpose, we employed quantitative research methods, measuring different aspects of quality of life that we treated as the dependent variables, with relationship status as the independent variable. In a sample of 1929 participants from Greece and Turkey, we found that relationship status was not significantly associated with physical health, relationships with friends and family, self-development, independence, recreation, or participation in social and communal activities. On the other hand, it was significantly associated with material goods, disposable income, social support, sexual satisfaction, and having children, with mated people scoring higher than single people. Despite using different methodologies for data collection, similar results were obtained in the two cultural contexts.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 14(10)
University of Crete (GR), University of Nicosia (CY), Başkent University (TR), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
University of Nicosia
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.