Unified Analysis Techniques for Programs with Outcomes

The theories required for program analysis have evolved past the foundations developed decades ago. Programs display computational effects such as nondeterminism, randomization, exceptions, and mutable state. Orthogonally, bug-finding is often more tangible than establishing correctness. Specialized techniques have been introduced to handle effects and incorrectness reasoning. While successful, the disjointed nature of those techniques means that new analysis systems must be built to analyze each kind of program and property. In my research, I am creating a logical foundation to consolidate the aforementioned theories, with which I plan to develop a new generation of static analysis tools that are simpler and more efficient than those available today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3689491.3691814
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unified Analysis Techniques for Programs with Outcomes

Noam Zilberstein
1 citations
Logic, programming, and type systems
0.35
article

Unified Analysis Techniques for Programs with Outcomes

Noam Zilberstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The theories required for program analysis have evolved past the foundations developed decades ago. Programs display computational effects such as nondeterminism, randomization, exceptions, and mutable state. Orthogonally, bug-finding is often more tangible than establishing correctness. Specialized techniques have been introduced to handle effects and incorrectness reasoning. While successful, the disjointed nature of those techniques means that new analysis systems must be built to analyze each kind of program and property. In my research, I am creating a logical foundation to consolidate the aforementioned theories, with which I plan to develop a new generation of static analysis tools that are simpler and more efficient than those available today.

Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Logic, programming, and type systems
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.