Research on a Strategy for Prediction Methods of Submarine Self-Propulsion Hydrodynamic Performance

To investigate the impact of different computational strategies on the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of a submarine model, a study was conducted using the RANS method, employing both the steady-state Moving Reference Frame (MRF) method and the unsteady Rigid Body Motion (RBM) method. Numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine model were performed under different computational strategies, including submarine with propeller, submarine first and propeller second, and propeller rotational speed iteration. The differences between these strategies were analyzed from various perspectives, such as submarine resistance, propeller hydrodynamic performance, total solver actual runtime, propeller unsteady bearing forces, and induced fluctuating pressure. The results indicated that when conducting numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine with a propeller, the fluctuation ranges of the submarine resistance, propeller thrust, and torque obtained by the steady MRF method were within 0.1% to 0.8%, compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state. In terms of computational efficiency, strategy 3 (RBM—submarine with a propeller) had the lowest computational efficiency, and the time to obtain a self-propulsion curve was 11.9 times, 4.4 times, and 3.1 times that of strategy 1 (MRF + RBM—submarine with a propeller), strategy 2 (RBM—submarine first, then propeller), and strategy 4 (RBM—propeller rotational speed iteration). When analyzing the propeller excitation forces under the submarine’s self-propulsion state using the steady-state MRF method combined with the unsteady RBM method, the frequency domain peak fluctuations were within 5% compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state, making this method suitable for numerical simulations of propeller excitation forces. These findings provide methodological support for evaluating the performance of the submarine’s hydrodynamic propulsion system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209294
Primary Topic
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on a Strategy for Prediction Methods of Submarine Self-Propulsion Hydrodynamic Performance

Yin Zhang, Pei Xu, Yingchun Guo
Applied Sciences
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
article

Research on a Strategy for Prediction Methods of Submarine Self-Propulsion Hydrodynamic Performance

Yin Zhang, Pei Xu, Yingchun Guo
article en

Abstract

To investigate the impact of different computational strategies on the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of a submarine model, a study was conducted using the RANS method, employing both the steady-state Moving Reference Frame (MRF) method and the unsteady Rigid Body Motion (RBM) method. Numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine model were performed under different computational strategies, including submarine with propeller, submarine first and propeller second, and propeller rotational speed iteration. The differences between these strategies were analyzed from various perspectives, such as submarine resistance, propeller hydrodynamic performance, total solver actual runtime, propeller unsteady bearing forces, and induced fluctuating pressure. The results indicated that when conducting numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine with a propeller, the fluctuation ranges of the submarine resistance, propeller thrust, and torque obtained by the steady MRF method were within 0.1% to 0.8%, compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state. In terms of computational efficiency, strategy 3 (RBM—submarine with a propeller) had the lowest computational efficiency, and the time to obtain a self-propulsion curve was 11.9 times, 4.4 times, and 3.1 times that of strategy 1 (MRF + RBM—submarine with a propeller), strategy 2 (RBM—submarine first, then propeller), and strategy 4 (RBM—propeller rotational speed iteration). When analyzing the propeller excitation forces under the submarine’s self-propulsion state using the steady-state MRF method combined with the unsteady RBM method, the frequency domain peak fluctuations were within 5% compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state, making this method suitable for numerical simulations of propeller excitation forces. These findings provide methodological support for evaluating the performance of the submarine’s hydrodynamic propulsion system.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(20)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.