Articles ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ONCOLOGIC SURGERY: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is a significant health outcome of interest particularly in patients with cancer undergoing surgical procedures. In this paper, both quantitative and qualitative methods will be discussed in terms of their application to the measurement of QoL as well as the use of such formal assessment tools as EORTC QLQ-C30 and informal semi-structured interviews. Two major difficulties in assessing QoL changes over time are its inherently qualitative and unstable elements, and psychometric problems of assessment tools, as well as potential biases in follow-up studies. QoL is enhanced based on psychological; Counseling and mindfulness-based approaches and rehabilitation that entails functional-based therapy and diet/ activity/sleep/relationship basis. Future research could focus on QoL as an outcome measure in specific diseases or populations, explore ways to apply patient-reported outcome technology to tailor dynamic and person-centered assessment methodologies, and examine the effects of designing tools that allow patients to receive instant feedback on their QoL to their clinicians’ practice and patients’ self-management behaviors. Getting the patient’s voice right is key in assessing the effectiveness of cancer surgery, as well as supporting care.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/42aab569
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Articles ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ONCOLOGIC SURGERY: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES

Kailash Chand Sharma
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Articles ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ONCOLOGIC SURGERY: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES

Kailash Chand Sharma
article en

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is a significant health outcome of interest particularly in patients with cancer undergoing surgical procedures. In this paper, both quantitative and qualitative methods will be discussed in terms of their application to the measurement of QoL as well as the use of such formal assessment tools as EORTC QLQ-C30 and informal semi-structured interviews. Two major difficulties in assessing QoL changes over time are its inherently qualitative and unstable elements, and psychometric problems of assessment tools, as well as potential biases in follow-up studies. QoL is enhanced based on psychological; Counseling and mindfulness-based approaches and rehabilitation that entails functional-based therapy and diet/ activity/sleep/relationship basis. Future research could focus on QoL as an outcome measure in specific diseases or populations, explore ways to apply patient-reported outcome technology to tailor dynamic and person-centered assessment methodologies, and examine the effects of designing tools that allow patients to receive instant feedback on their QoL to their clinicians’ practice and patients’ self-management behaviors. Getting the patient’s voice right is key in assessing the effectiveness of cancer surgery, as well as supporting care.

Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Articles ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ONCOLOGIC SURGERY: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES — Kailash Chand Sharma · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS