ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN EDUCATIONAL PHRASEOLOGISMS

The purpose of our study is not only to analyze educational phraseologisms from a semantic and structural point of view, but also to determine the ratio of motivated and unmotivated phraseology. While doing our research we have used the following methods: literature review, descriptive method, analysis and synthesis methods. Results: we believe that motivated phraseologisms prevail over unmotivated phraseologisms in English and Russian. Having analyzed the 30 most frequently used phraseological units on the topic of “education”, we can confirm that the ratio of motivated phraseological units in both languages is significantly higher than unmotivated ones. Namely: in the English language, among 30 set expressions, there are 20 motivated phraseological units, which is 67% of the total, and 10 unmotivated phraseological units, which is 33%. As for the Russian language, the picture is the same: we have 20 motivated phraseological units, which is 67%, and 10 unmotivated ones, that is, 33%. In general, the percentage of motivated and unmotivated phraseological units in both languages is the same: 67% motivated set expressions and 33% unmotivated. The results obtained in the process of studying phraseological material can be used in compiling dictionaries, teaching aids for students studying Russian and English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltanym
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2024-3-51-59
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN EDUCATIONAL PHRASEOLOGISMS

Kulpash Koptleuova, Abdyzhalil Akkuzov
1 links
Tiltanym
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN EDUCATIONAL PHRASEOLOGISMS

Kulpash Koptleuova, Abdyzhalil Akkuzov
article en

Abstract

The purpose of our study is not only to analyze educational phraseologisms from a semantic and structural point of view, but also to determine the ratio of motivated and unmotivated phraseology. While doing our research we have used the following methods: literature review, descriptive method, analysis and synthesis methods. Results: we believe that motivated phraseologisms prevail over unmotivated phraseologisms in English and Russian. Having analyzed the 30 most frequently used phraseological units on the topic of “education”, we can confirm that the ratio of motivated phraseological units in both languages is significantly higher than unmotivated ones. Namely: in the English language, among 30 set expressions, there are 20 motivated phraseological units, which is 67% of the total, and 10 unmotivated phraseological units, which is 33%. As for the Russian language, the picture is the same: we have 20 motivated phraseological units, which is 67%, and 10 unmotivated ones, that is, 33%. In general, the percentage of motivated and unmotivated phraseological units in both languages is the same: 67% motivated set expressions and 33% unmotivated. The results obtained in the process of studying phraseological material can be used in compiling dictionaries, teaching aids for students studying Russian and English.

Tiltanym(3)
Tashenev University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN EDUCATIONAL PHRASEOLOGISMS — Kulpash Koptleuova, Abdyzhalil Akkuzov · Tiltanym (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS