POLYASPECT EXPRESSION OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN RUSSIAN, KAZAKH, UZBEK, AND ENGLISH PROVERBS

The article deals with the actual problem of the expression of anthropocentrism in proverbs of the Russian, Kazakh, Uzbek, and English languages. The content of the proverb is always anthropocentric, since the moralizing, edification of its meaning is directed at a person, therefore all proverbs are anthropocentric, but the ways of expressing anthropocentrism in them are different – explicit and implicit: a) the explicit (open) expression of anthropocentrism is conveyed by lexemes denoting the concept of person (person, man, woman, he, she, they, ...); b) the implicit (indirect) expression of anthropocentrism is transmitted without the use of lexemes denoting the concept of a person, but their edification, allegory are addressed to a person. Anthropocentrism in proverbs is characterized by generality, collectivity, therefore it is also transmitted by lexemes (names) denoting animals, as well as the plant world, which are characterized by both positive and non-positive qualities. The transfer of anthropocentrism by zoonyms is often associated with religious canons such as the prohibition or permission to eat meat of an animal (for example, a donkey or a pig), since some of them are controversial in the history of religion (for example, pork). Therefore, in some proverbs, the names of such animals have a positive characteristic directed at humans, in others – a negative one. The research material was proverbial dictionaries of four languages, scientific and popular scientific research on this problem and the resulting universal and national-cultural views. The proverbial fund of each language functions with an anthropocentric meaning. During the analysis of the linguistic material, such methods as comparative, semantic-stylistic, historical-comparative, etc. were used, which contributed to obtaining results of theoretical and practical significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltanym
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2024-3-12-21
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POLYASPECT EXPRESSION OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN RUSSIAN, KAZAKH, UZBEK, AND ENGLISH PROVERBS

М. Джусупов
1 citations
Tiltanym
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
2.10
article

POLYASPECT EXPRESSION OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN RUSSIAN, KAZAKH, UZBEK, AND ENGLISH PROVERBS

М. Джусупов
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article deals with the actual problem of the expression of anthropocentrism in proverbs of the Russian, Kazakh, Uzbek, and English languages. The content of the proverb is always anthropocentric, since the moralizing, edification of its meaning is directed at a person, therefore all proverbs are anthropocentric, but the ways of expressing anthropocentrism in them are different – explicit and implicit: a) the explicit (open) expression of anthropocentrism is conveyed by lexemes denoting the concept of person (person, man, woman, he, she, they, ...); b) the implicit (indirect) expression of anthropocentrism is transmitted without the use of lexemes denoting the concept of a person, but their edification, allegory are addressed to a person. Anthropocentrism in proverbs is characterized by generality, collectivity, therefore it is also transmitted by lexemes (names) denoting animals, as well as the plant world, which are characterized by both positive and non-positive qualities. The transfer of anthropocentrism by zoonyms is often associated with religious canons such as the prohibition or permission to eat meat of an animal (for example, a donkey or a pig), since some of them are controversial in the history of religion (for example, pork). Therefore, in some proverbs, the names of such animals have a positive characteristic directed at humans, in others – a negative one. The research material was proverbial dictionaries of four languages, scientific and popular scientific research on this problem and the resulting universal and national-cultural views. The proverbial fund of each language functions with an anthropocentric meaning. During the analysis of the linguistic material, such methods as comparative, semantic-stylistic, historical-comparative, etc. were used, which contributed to obtaining results of theoretical and practical significance.

Tiltanym(3)
Uzbek State University of World Languages (UZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.