Type Checking with Rewriting Rules

Type classes support the implementation of highly reusable algorithms and data structures without loss of efficiency. Initially developed in Haskell, they have become central to the design of several modern programming languages, including Swift, Rust, Hylo, and Carbon. A key part of their success is the ability to express sophisticated abstractions using constraints on the types associated with their operations. However, this expressiveness invites thorny theoretical and engineering questions. In particular, the support of recursive constraints—i.e., constraints specifying that an associated type of an abstraction must be a model of that abstraction—leaves type equivalence undecidable. This paper studies a semi-decidable technique to tackle this problem that was first developed in Swift’s compiler. The core idea is to encode constraints into a term rewriting system and use normalization to answer type checking queries. We describe this approach formally through the lens of, a calculus originally designed to capture generic programming best practices; and discuss an implementation in the context of Hylo, a language inspired by Swift and Rust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3687997.3695640
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type Checking with Rewriting Rules

Dimitri Racordon
Logic, programming, and type systems
article

Type Checking with Rewriting Rules

Dimitri Racordon
article en

Abstract

Type classes support the implementation of highly reusable algorithms and data structures without loss of efficiency. Initially developed in Haskell, they have become central to the design of several modern programming languages, including Swift, Rust, Hylo, and Carbon. A key part of their success is the ability to express sophisticated abstractions using constraints on the types associated with their operations. However, this expressiveness invites thorny theoretical and engineering questions. In particular, the support of recursive constraints—i.e., constraints specifying that an associated type of an abstraction must be a model of that abstraction—leaves type equivalence undecidable. This paper studies a semi-decidable technique to tackle this problem that was first developed in Swift’s compiler. The core idea is to encode constraints into a term rewriting system and use normalization to answer type checking queries. We describe this approach formally through the lens of, a calculus originally designed to capture generic programming best practices; and discuss an implementation in the context of Hylo, a language inspired by Swift and Rust.

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.